（專題）「師生共同增能」與「學生增能」教學實驗方案促進偏遠地區國中學生知識信念、自我調整策略與科學學習成就之比較研究
作者:陳慧娟(國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系)
卷期：60卷第4期
日期：2015年12月
頁碼：21-53
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(4).02
摘要：
本研究探討偏遠地區國中學生知識信念教學實驗方案之成效。自變項「組別」，分為「知識信念師生增能組」（簡稱EBts）、「知識信念學生增能組」（簡稱EBs）與「傳統教學組」（簡稱T）；依變項為知識信念、自我調整策略與科學學習成就。研究對象為三所偏遠地區學校164位八年級學生，採獨立樣本單因子準實驗設計，蒐集的資料利用變異數與共變數分析進行考驗，有五項具體發現：一、教學處理後，EBts與EBs無論在知識信念各分量表以及全量表分數，均優於T；然而EBts只在能力天生、快速習得與全量表分數優於EBs，在科學知識簡單性與知識確定性則未因科學教師是否參與增能訓練而有差異。二、經過教學介入，只有EBts在科學學習自我調整策略分數顯著高於EBs。三、不同教學實驗處理對高、中、低三組知識信念學生的自我調整策略無任何影響。四、兩組教學實驗課程皆比傳統教學課程有利於促進學生的科學學習認知表現；但EBts與EBs的學習表現無顯著差異。五、高知識信念學生經過EBts的教學介入，科學學習成就明顯優於T學生；而低知識信念的學生，無論在EBts或EBs，其科學學習認知表現都顯著高於T；但對中等程度知識信念的學生，則無任何顯著影響。最後根據本研究發現提出解釋與建議，期盼能作為偏遠地區教師培力、弱勢學生學習輔導，以及教育革新之參考。
關鍵詞：自我調整學習、知識信念、科學學習、偏遠地區、增能
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- 宋曜廷、邱佳民、張恬熒、曾芬蘭（2011）。以國中基本學力測驗成績探討學習成就落差。教育政策論壇，14（1），85-117。【Sung, Y.-T., Chiou, J.-M., Chang, T.-Y., & Tseng, F.-L. (2011). Investigating learning achievement gap through students’ basic competence test scores. Educational Policy Forum, 14(1), 85-117.】
- 科技部（2013，3 月27 日）。影響我國偏遠與非偏遠地區國中學生學業成就之教育資源研究成果發表。取自http://www.most.gov.tw/ct.aspx?xItem=16564&ctNode=1637&mp=1【Ministry of Science and Technology. (2013, March 27). Impact of educational resource on junior high school student achievement in Taiwan rural and non-rural area. Retrieved from http://www.most.gov.tw/ct.aspx?xItem=16564&ctNode=1637&mp=1】
- 唐淑華（2000）。以讀書治療挑戰低成就學生之知識信念的實驗研究。中華輔導學報，8，21-50。【Tang, S.-H. (2000). The challenging of underachievers’ epistemological beliefs: The approach of bib liotherapy. Chinese Annual Report of Guidance and Counseling, 8, 21-50.】
- 許添明、葉珍玲（2014）。偏遠地區教育－成功專案。教育人力與專業發展，31（1），5-16。【Sheu, T.-M., & Yeh, C.-L. (2014). The remote area education－A successful project. Educators and Professional Development, 31(1), 5-16.】
- 許誌庭（2014）。偏遠地區的教育困境：空間、社會與文化。教育人力與專業發展，31（1），33-42。【Sheu, C.-T. (2014). The education dilemma of the remote areas: Space, society and culture. Educators and Professional Development, 31(1), 33-42.】
» 展開更多
- 宋曜廷、邱佳民、張恬熒、曾芬蘭（2011）。以國中基本學力測驗成績探討學習成就落差。教育政策論壇，14（1），85-117。【Sung, Y.-T., Chiou, J.-M., Chang, T.-Y., & Tseng, F.-L. (2011). Investigating learning achievement gap through students’ basic competence test scores. Educational Policy Forum, 14(1), 85-117.】
- 科技部（2013，3 月27 日）。影響我國偏遠與非偏遠地區國中學生學業成就之教育資源研究成果發表。取自http://www.most.gov.tw/ct.aspx?xItem=16564&ctNode=1637&mp=1【Ministry of Science and Technology. (2013, March 27). Impact of educational resource on junior high school student achievement in Taiwan rural and non-rural area. Retrieved from http://www.most.gov.tw/ct.aspx?xItem=16564&ctNode=1637&mp=1】
- 唐淑華（2000）。以讀書治療挑戰低成就學生之知識信念的實驗研究。中華輔導學報，8，21-50。【Tang, S.-H. (2000). The challenging of underachievers’ epistemological beliefs: The approach of bib liotherapy. Chinese Annual Report of Guidance and Counseling, 8, 21-50.】
- 許添明、葉珍玲（2014）。偏遠地區教育－成功專案。教育人力與專業發展，31（1），5-16。【Sheu, T.-M., & Yeh, C.-L. (2014). The remote area education－A successful project. Educators and Professional Development, 31(1), 5-16.】
- 許誌庭（2014）。偏遠地區的教育困境：空間、社會與文化。教育人力與專業發展，31（1），33-42。【Sheu, C.-T. (2014). The education dilemma of the remote areas: Space, society and culture. Educators and Professional Development, 31(1), 33-42.】
- 陳萩卿、張景媛（2007）。知識信念影響學習運作模式之驗證。教育心理學報，39（1），23-43。doi:10.6251/BEP.20070129【Chen, C.-C., & Chang, C.-Y. (2007). The verification of epistemological beliefs in learning process model. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 39(1), 23-43. doi:10.6251/BEP.20070129】
- 陳慧娟（2011）。偏遠地區弱勢學生動機診斷。教育部專題計畫研究成果報告。臺北市：國立臺灣師範大學教育研究與評鑑中心。【Chen, H.-J. (2011). Diagnose disadvantage students’ motivation in remote areas schools. Ministry of Education project report. Taipei, Taiwan: Center for Educational Research and Evaluation, National Taiwan Normal University.】
- 楊淑萍、林煥祥（2010）。由家庭經濟資源及文化資源探討我國學生在PISA科學、數學素養的表現。科學教育學刊，18（6），547-562。【Yang, S.-P., & Lin, H.-S. (2010). Analyses of science and mathematics literacy of students with different economic assets and cultural assets. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 18(6), 547-562.】
- 臺灣PISA 國家研究中心（2014）。臺灣PISA 2012 精簡報告。取自http://pisa.nutn.edu.tw/download/data/TaiwanPISA2012ShortReport.PDF【Taiwan PISA National Center. (2014). Taiwan PISA 2012 to streamline reporting. Retrieved from http://pisa.nutn.edu.tw/download/data/TaiwanPISA2012ShortReport.PDF】
- Bendixen, L. D., & Rule, D. C. (2004). An integrative approach to personal epistemology: A guiding model. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 69-80. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3901_7
- Blanden, J., & Gibbons, L. (2014). Education and intergenerational mobility: Help or hindrance?(Working Paper No. 8). Retrieved from http://repec.ioe.ac.uk/REPEc/pdf/qsswp1401.pdf
- Brabander, C. J., & Rozendaal, J. S. (2007). Epistemological beliefs, social status, and school preference: An exploration of relationships. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 51(2), 141-162. doi:10.1080/00313830701191621
- Brownlee, J., Schraw, G., & Berthelsen, D. (2011). Personal epistemology and teacher education: An emerging field of research. In J. Brownlee, G. Schraw, & D. Berthelsen (Eds.), Personal epistemology and teacher education (pp. 3-21). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Chan, K.-W., & Elliott, R. G. (2004). Epistemological beliefs across cultures: Critique and analysis of beliefs structure studies. Educational Psychology, 24(2), 123-142. doi:10.1080/0144341032000160100
- Chen, J. A. (2012). Implicit theories, epistemological beliefs and science motivation: A personcentered approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 724-735. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.07.013
- Chen, J. A., & Pajares, F. (2010). Implicit theories of ability of grade 6 science students: Relation to epistemological beliefs and academic motivation and achievement in science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(1), 75-87. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.10.003
- Chi, M. T. H. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 61-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Çoban, G. Ü., Ateş, Ö., & Şengören, S. K. (2011). Epistemological views of prospective physics teachers. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(3), 1224-1258.
- Cole, M. (2005). Using cross-cultural psychology to design afterschool educational activities in different cultural settings. In W. Friedlmeier, P. Chakkarath, & B. Schwarz (Eds.), Culture and human development: The importance of cross-cultural research for the social sciences (pp.50-70). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
- Destin, M., & Oyserman, D. (2009). From assets to school outcomes: How finances shape children’s perceived possibilities and intentions. Psychological Science, 20(4), 414-418. doi:10.1111/j. 1467-9280.2009.02309.x
- Erikson, R., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (2011). Has social mobility in Britain decreased? Reconciling divergent findings on income and class mobility. The British Journal of Sociology, 61(2), 211-230. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01310.x
- Fives, H., & Buehl, M. M. (2010). Teachers’ articulation of beliefs about teaching knowledge: Conceptualizing a belief framework. In L. D. Bendixen & F. C. Feucht (Eds.), Personal epistemology in the classroom (pp. 470-515). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Gallimore, R., & Goldenberg, C. (2001). Analyzing cultural models and settings to connect minority achievement and school improvement research. Educational Psychologist, 36(1), 45-56. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3601_5
- Gill, M. G., Ashton, P. T., & Algina, J. (2004). Changing preservice teachers’ epistemological beliefs about teaching and learning in mathematics: An intervention study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(2), 164-185. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.003
- Goldthorpe, J. H. (2013). Understanding – and misunderstanding – social mobility in Britain: The entry of economists, the confusion of politicians and the limits of educational policy. Journal of Social Policy, 42(3), 431-450. doi:10.1017/S004727941300024X
- Gregg, P., & Macmillan, L. (2010). Family income, education and cognitive ability in the next generation: Exploring income gradients in education and test scores for current cohorts of youth. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 1(3), 259-280. doi:10.14301/llcs.v1i3.95
- Hammer, D. (1995). Epistemological considerations in teaching introductory physics. Science Education, 79(4), 393-413. doi:10.1002/sce.3730790404
- Hashweh, M. Z. (1996). Effects of science teachers’ epistemological beliefs in teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(1), 47-63. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199601)33:1<47::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-P
- Haviland, J., & Kramer, D. (1991). Affect-cognition relationships in adolescent diaries: The case of Anne Frank. Human Development, 34(3), 143-159. doi:10.1159/000277044
- Higgins, K. (1997). The effect of year-long instruction in mathematical problem solving on middle-school students’ attitudes, beliefs, and abilities. Journal of Experimental Education,66(1), 5-28. doi:10.1080/00220979709601392
- Hofer, B. K. (1999). Instructional context in the college mathematics classroom: Epistemological beliefs and student motivation. Journal of Staff, Program, and Organizational Development,16(2), 73-82.
- Hofer, B. K. (2001). Personal epistemology research: Implications for learning and teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 353-383. doi:10.1023/A:1011965830686
- Hofer, B. K. (2004). Epistemological understanding as a metacognitive process: Thinking aloud during online searching. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 43-55. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3901_5
- Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1),88-140. doi:10.3102/00346543067001088
- Kang, N.-H., & Wallace, C. S. (2005). Secondary science teachers’ use of laboratory activities:Linking epistemological beliefs, goals, and practices. Science Education, 89(1), 140-165.doi:10.1002/sce.20013
- Karabenick, S. A., & Moosa, S. (2005). Culture and personal epistemology: U.S. and Middle Eastern students’ beliefs about scientific knowledge and knowing. Social Psychology of Education, 8(4),375-393. doi:10.1007/s11218-005-1826-3
- Kienhues, D., Bromme, R., & Stahl, E. (2008). Changing epistemological beliefs: The unexpected impact of a short-term intervention. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(4), 545-565.doi:10.1348/000709907X268589
- Liang, J.-C., Lee, M.-H., & Tsai, C.-C. (2010). The relations between scientific epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning science among science-major undergraduates in Taiwan. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(1), 43-59. doi:10.3860/taper.v19i1.1508
- Lin, T.-J., Deng, F., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). High school students’ scientific epistemological beliefs, motivation in learning science, and their relationships: A comparative study within the Chinese culture. International Journal of Educational Development, 33(1),37-47. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.01.007
- Louca, L., Elby, A., Hammer, D., & Kagey, T. (2004). Epistemological resources: Applying a new epistemological framework to science instruction. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 57-68. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3901_6
- McInerney, D. M., Roche, L. A., McInerney, V., & Marsh, H. W. (1997). Cultural perspectives on school motivation: The relevance and application of goal theory. American Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 207-236. doi:10.3102/00028312034001207
- Mood, C., Jonsson, J. O., & Bihagen, E. (2012). Socioeconomic persistence across generations:Cognitive and noncognitive processes. In J. Ermisch, M. Jäntti, & T. Smeeding (Eds.), From parents to children: The intergenerational transmission of advantage (pp. 53-83). New York,NY: Russell Sage.
- Muis, K. R. (2004). Personal epistemology and mathematics: A critical review and synthesis of research. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 317-377. doi:10.3102/00346543074003317
- Muis, K. R., & Duffy, M. (2013). Epistemic climate and epistemic change: Instruction designed to change students’ epistemic beliefs, learning strategies, and improve achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 213-225. doi:10.1037/a0029690
- Muis, K. R., & Sinatra, G. M. (2008). Universities’ cultures and epistemic beliefs: Examining differences between two similar countries. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Knowing, knowledge, and beliefs: Epistemological studies across diverse cultures (pp. 137-150). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6596-5_6
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). Excellence through equity: Giving every student the chance to succeed (Volume II). Paris, France: Author.
- Ozkal, K., Tekkaya, C., Sungur, S., Cakiroglu, J., & Cakiroglu, E. (2010). Elementary students’ scientific epistemological beliefs in relation to socio-economic status and gender. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(7), 873-885. doi:10.1007/s10972-009-9169-0
- Parcel, T. L., & Geschwender, L. E. (1995). Explaining southern disadvantage in verbal facility among young children. Social Forces, 73(3), 841-872. doi:10.1093/sf/73.3.841
- Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years. New York,NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
- Phan, H. P. (2008). Exploring epistemological beliefs and learning approaches in context: A sociocultural perspective. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 6(3),793-822.
- Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivation beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167-199. doi:10.3102/00346543063002167
- Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R.Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3
- Qian, G., & Alvermann, D. (1995). Role of epistemological beliefs and learned helplessness in secondary school students’ learning science concepts from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 282-292. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.87.2.282
- Richter, T., & Schmid, S. (2010). Epistemological beliefs and epistemic strategies in self-regulated learning. Metacognition Learning, 5(1), 47-65. doi:10.1007/s11409-009-9038-4
- Roth, G., & Weinstock, M. (2013). Teachers’ epistemological beliefs as an antecedent of autonomy supportive teaching. Motivation and Emotion, 37(3), 402-412. doi:10.1007/s11031-012-9338-x
- Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498-504. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.3498
- Schommer, M. (1993). Epistemological development and academic performance among secondary students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 406- 411. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.406
- Schommer-Aikins, M. (2004). Explaining the epistemological belief system: Introducing the embedded systemic model and coordinated research approach. Educational Psychologist, 39(1),19-29. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3901_3
- Schommer-Aikins, M., & Easter, M. (2008). Epistemological beliefs’ contributions to study strategies of Asian Americans and European Americans. Journal of Educational Psychology,100(4), 920-929. doi:0.1037/0022-0663.100.4.920
- Schraw, G. (2001). Current themes and future directions in epistemological research: A commentary. Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 451-465. doi:10.1023/A:1011922015665
- Schraw, G., & Sinatra, G. M. (2004). Epistemological development and its impact on cognition in academic domains. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(2), 95-102. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.005
- Tanel, Z. (2013). The effect of learning the history of physics on the scientific epistemological beliefs of pre-service teachers. Science Education International, 24(3), 232-253.
- Topcu, M. S. (2013). Preservice teachers’ epistemological beliefs in physics, chemistry, and biology: A mixed study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 433-458.doi:10.1007/S10763-012-9345-0
- Trautwein, U., & Lüdtke, O. (2007). Epistemological beliefs, school achievement, and college major: A large-scale longitudinal study on the impact of certainty beliefs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 348-366. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.11.003
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Walker, S., Brownlee, J., Whiteford, C., Exley, B., & Woods, A. (2012). A longitudinal study of change in preservice teachers’ personal epistemologies. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(5), 24-35. doi:10.14221/ajte.2012v37n5.1
- Yang, F.-Y., Chang, C.-Y., & Hsu, Y.-S. (2008). Teacher views about the constructivist instruction and personal epistemology–A national study in Taiwan. Educational Studies, 34(5), 527-542.doi:1080/03055690802288486
- Zimmerman, B., & Risemberg, R. (1997). Becoming a self-regulated writer: A social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 73-101. doi:10.1006/ceps.1997.0919
| 中文APA引文格式 | 陳慧娟(2015)。「師生共同增能」與「學生增能」教學實驗方案促進偏遠地區國中學生知識信念、自我調整策略與科學學習成就之比較研究。教育科學研究期刊，60(4)，21-53。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(4).02
|
|---|
| APA Format | Chen, H.-J. (2015). Effects of Empowerment Programs in Remote Junior High Schools on Scientific Epistemological Beliefs, Self-Regulation Strategies, and Academic Achievement in Science. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 60(4), 21-53. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(4).02
|
|---|
Journal directory listing - Volume 60 (2015) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【60(4)】December (Special Issue: Support for disadvantaged students)
(Special Issue) Effects of Empowerment Programs in Remote Junior High Schools on Scientific Epistemological Beliefs, Self-Regulation Strategies, and Academic Achievement in Science
Author: Huey-Jiuan Chen(Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling, National Taiwan Normal University)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 60, No. 4
Date：December 2015
Pages：21-53
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(4).02
Abstract：
With the continually growing recognition of the notion of human rights and democratic ideals, addressing the education gap between social classes has become a priority for governments worldwide. This research focused on the effects in remote schools of epistemological belief programs conducted with both teachers and students as well as with only students, and examined how junior high school teachers and students’ scientific epistemological beliefs, self-regulation strategies, and academic achievements in science changed following the experimental programs.
Research samples were collected from 164 eighth-grade students at three remote schools in New Taipei City and Taoyuan City, Taiwan. This research adopted a quasiexperimental design. Two experimental groups were formed, and the students in both participated in a 14-week empowerment programs. All participants completed the Epistemological Beliefs Scale, Self-Regulated Learning Questionnaire, and Science Academic Achievement Test. The obtained data were analyzed using ANOVA and ANCOVA. The main findings of this research are as follows. (1) Both the epistemological beliefs intervention for science teachers and students (EBts) and the epistemological beliefs intervention for only students (EBs) yielded higher innate ability, fast acquisition, knowledge simplicity, knowledge certainty, and overall scores than did the traditional teaching materials (T). The EBts intervention yielded superior innate ability, fast acquisition, and overall scores than the EBs intervention did, but the same results were not observed for simplicity and certainty of science knowledge. (2) Similarly, the EBts intervention yielded higher self-regulation strategies in learning science than the EBs intervention did. However, no significant difference was observed among the other groups. (3) No significant difference in terms of self-regulation strategies was present among participants with different levels of science epistemological beliefs. (4) Both the EBts and EBs groups exhibited higher science learning cognitive performance than the T group did. However, no significant difference existed between the EBts and EBs groups. (5) Among the students with high scientific epistemological beliefs, those in the EBts group had significantly higher cognitive performance than those in the T group did; among the students with low scientific epistemological belief students, both the EBts and EBs intervention had a significantly more positive effect on cognitive performance than the T nonintervention did. However, the cognitive performance of students with medium scientific epistemological beliefs did not differ among any of the groups. The implications of and suggestions based on the research findings are expected to contribute to remedial instruction and learning guidance for disadvantaged students in remote areas.
Keywords：self-regulated learning, epistemological belief, science academic achievement, remote area, empowerment