期刊目錄列表 - 61卷(2016) - 【教育科學研究期刊】61(1)三月刊

凱利方格法在科學教育研究的應用 作者:林裕仁(國立交通大學教育研究所)、林日宗(國立高雄師範大學科學教育暨環境教育研究所)、洪振方(國立高雄師範大學科學教育暨環境教育研究所)

卷期:61卷第1期
日期:2016年3月
頁碼:43-67
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(1).02

摘要:

本研究以文獻回顧的方法探索凱利方格法的原理與策略,再反思科學教育研究領域中可應用凱利方格法進行研究的契機與限制。凱利方格法的分析與探索主要包含下列階段:元素與構念的萃取、方格的建構與評比,以及方格的分析與解釋。這些資料分析的過程對教育研究而言具備以下優勢。首先,研究者透過凱利方格法的應用,建立有系統的資料蒐集與彙整架構,發現資料中既存的脈絡。再者,凱利方格法除了能針對單一個案所反映的方格評比進行探索與分析外,也容許跨個案的比較。在科學教育相關研究中,這些優勢適合被應用於探索學生科學學習、教師專業發展,以及評鑑科學課程與教科書等。本研究最後也說明在應用凱利方格法分析時須考量的信度與效度,以及相關的研究限制,以更明確地說明使用凱利方格法分析的策略。
 

關鍵詞:科學教育、個人建構理論、凱利方格法
 

《詳全文》 檔名

參考文獻:
  1. 吳育倫、林靜雯(2013)。兒童地球形狀概念演化樹之跨年級調查驗證。教育科學研究期刊,58(4),133-163。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2013.58(4).05【Wu, Y.-L., & Lin, J.-W. (2013). Validating children’s conceptual evolution tree of earth in a cross-grade study. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 58(4), 133-163. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2013.58(4).05】
  2. 宋曜廷、潘佩妤(2010)。混合研究在教育研究的應用。教育科學研究期刊,55(4),97-130。doi:10.3966/2073753X2010125504004【Sung, Y.-T., & Pan, P.-Y. (2010). Applications of mixed methods research in educational studies. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 55(4), 97-130. doi:10.3966/2073753X2010125504004】
  3. 林陳涌、楊榮祥(1998)。利用凱利方格晤談法探討教師對科學本質的觀點-個案研究。科學教育學刊,6(2),113-128。【Lin, C.-Y., & Yang, J.-H. (1998). A case study of teacher’s views of science. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 6(2), 113-128.】
  4. 洪振方、周進洋、蔡智文、蔡嘉興(2008)。從「內化與修正」朝向「外推與解釋」的思考機制:以國中一年級學生質量守恆概念發展為例。師大學報:科學教育類,53(2),59-89。doi:10.6300/JNTNU.2008.53(2).03【Hung, J.-F., Chou, C.-Y., Tsai, C.-W., & Tsai, C.-H. (2008). The movement of thinking mechanism from ‘internalization and revision’ to ‘extrapolation and explanation’: The study on the conceptual development about conservation of mass for Taiwanese seventh graders. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Science Education, 53(2), 59-89. doi:10.6300/JNTNU.2008.53(2).03】
  5. 高慧蓮、蘇明洲、許茂聰(2003)。國小六年級學童呼吸作用另有概念之質化研究。師大學報:科學教育類,48(1),63-92。doi:10.6300/JNTNU.2003.48(1).04【Kao, H.-L., Su, M.-C., & Sheu, M.-T. (2003). A qualitative study of elementary school 6th grade students’ alternative conceptions of respiration. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Science Education, 48(1), 63-92. doi:10.6300/JNTNU.2003.48(1).04】
» 展開更多
中文APA引文格式
林裕仁、林日宗、洪振方(2016)。凱利方格法在科學教育研究的應用。教育科學研究期刊61(1),43-67。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(1).02
APA Format
Lin, Y.-R., Lin, J.-T., & Hung, J.-F. (2016). Application of Kelly’s Repertory Grid Technique in Research on Science Education. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 61(1), 43-67. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(1).02

Journal directory listing - Volume 61(2016) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【61(1)】March

Application of Kelly’s Repertory Grid Technique in Research on Science Education Author:
Yu-Ren Lin(Institute of Education, National Chiao Tung University), Jih-Tsung Lin(Graduate Institute of Science Education& Environmental Education, National Kaohsiung Normal University), Jeng-Fung Hung(Graduate Institute of Science Education& Environmental Education, National Kaohsiung Normal University)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 61, No. 1
Date:March 2016
Pages:43-67
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(1).02

Abstract:

This paper discusses the possible application of the repertory grid technique (RGT) in science education through a literature review. We first describe the common strategies for using RGT in psychology and education research. We then explore the reasons for using RGT and the relationship between the aforementioned strategies and the purposes of studies in the literature. Finally, we explain whether and how using RGT can assist researchers in deeply exploring science education. Three basic strategies for using RGT are summarized according to a literature review: eliciting elements and constructs, constructing the grid, and analyzing the grid. RGT enables researchers to construct and reconstruct the qualitative data on the basis of quantitative analysis, which supports exploring subjects’ cognitive systems and comparing subjects. In science education, studies have applied RGT for various purposes, which we categorized into three types: exploring individual cognitive systems, developing principles for teachers’ professional development, and evaluating the quality of textbooks. The limitations and validations of RGT are discussed in the final section of this paper.

 

Keywords:science education, personal construct theory, repertory grid technique