期刊目錄列表 - 61卷(2016) - 【教育科學研究期刊】61(3)九月刊

學生擬題教學對情意學習成效及學業成就影響之後設分析 作者:廖遠光(中國文化大學師資培育中心)、張澄清(科技部人文社會科學研究中心)

卷期:61卷第3期
日期:2016年9月
頁碼:1-42
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(3).01

摘要:

本研究應用後設分析法探討學生擬題教學對於提升情意及學業成就之效果,並試圖探討可能影響教學成效的變數。以擬題、出題、problem posing、problem generation、problem writing、problem formulation為關鍵詞,至「臺灣博碩士論文」、「CETD中文碩博士論文」、「臺灣期刊論文索引」及「CEPS中文電子期刊」等資料庫檢索相關文獻,共蒐集擬題教學成效之實驗研究31篇,可提供情意學習17筆及學業成就34筆之效果量,計有2,421個樣本納入分析。研究結果顯示,學生擬題教學對於情意及學業成就具有正向效應,整體效果量分別為0.34及0.57。意即對於情意及學業成就的提升,皆優於傳統講述式教學法,且對於學業成就的提升效果更佳。情意學習會受到「學科領域」、「教學者偏誤」、「擬題次數」及「網路擬題」等變數之調節作用而呈現差異;學業成就的調節變數則有「學習階段」、「學科領域」、「教學者偏誤」、「課程時數」及「分組學習」等。

關鍵詞:出題、後設分析、情意學習成效、學業成就、擬題

《詳全文》 檔名

參考文獻:
  1. 于富雲、吳純萍(2012)。學生出題的學習歷程及其與工作價值感之相關。教育科學研究期刊,57(4),135-162。doi:10.3966/2073753X2012125704005【Yu, F.-Y., & Wu, C.-P. (2012). Student question-generation: The learning processes involved and their relationships with students’ perceived value. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 57(4), 135-162. doi:10. 3966/2073753X2012125704005】
  2. 于富雲、劉祐興(2008)。學生出題與傳統練習策略對大學生學習成就、認知與後設認知策略使用之影響。教育與心理研究,31(3),25-52。【Yu, F.-Y., & Liu, Y.-H. (2008). The comparative effects of student-posing and question-answering strategies on promoting college students’ academic achievement, cognitive and metacognitive strategies use. Journal of Education & Psychology, 31(3), 25-52.】
  3. 方文鋒(2009)。合作擬題教學法對國一學生在一元一次方程式解題之影響(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南市。【Fang, W.-F. (2009). The influence of using cooperative problem-posing instruction for solving the problems of one-variable linear equations to the seventh grade students (Unpublished master’s thesis). National University of Tainan, Tainan, Taiwan.】
  4. 王俐文(2008)。融入擬題的幾何證明教學對國三學生幾何能力之影響(未出版碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。【Wang, L.-W. (2008). The effect of geometry proof instruction integrated with proposition posing on ninth graders’ geometry abilities (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Changhua University of Education, Changhua, Taiwan.】
  5. 王靜雯(2007)。合作出題對高職生英語學習影響之研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。【Wang, C.-W. (2007). The effects of cooperative item construction on EFL vocational high school students’ English learning (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi County, Taiwan.】
» 展開更多
中文APA引文格式
廖遠光、張澄清(2016)。學生擬題教學對情意學習成效及學業成就影響之後設分析。教育科學研究期刊61(3),1-42。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(3).01
APA Format
Liao, Y.-K., & Chang, C.-C. (2016). Effects of the problem posing strategies of students on affective learning outcomes and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 61(3), 1-42. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(3).01

Journal directory listing - Volume 61(2016) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【61(3)】September

Effects of the Problem Posing Strategies of Students on Affective Learning Outcomes and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis Author: Yuen-Kuang Liao (Center for Teacher Education, Chinese Culture University), Cheng-Ching Chang (Research Institute for the Humanities and Social Sciences, Ministry of Science and Technology)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 61, No. 3
Date:September 2016
Pages:1-42
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(3).01

Abstract:

A meta-analysis was performed to synthesize existing research that investigated the effects of problem-posing strategies on the affective learning outcomes and academic achievement of students in Taiwan. We adopted problem posing, problem generation, problem writing, and problem formulation as keywords and gathered 31 studies (comprising 17 comparisons for the affective domain and 34 comparisons for academic achievement), converting their quantitative data to effect size (ES). The results demonstrated that problem posing strategies provided considerable benefits than traditional instruction did on students’ affective learning outcomes (ES = 0.34) and academic achievement (ES = 0.57), and the larger positive effect sizes showed the benefit is greater on academic achievement. In addition, four moderator variables were selected for investigating affective learning outcomes and five moderator variables were selected for investigating academic achievement (including subject area, instructor bias, total number of courses, and cooperative learning), all of which had statistically significant impacts on the mean ES. Finally, the noteworthy suggestions and limitations of this study were discussed.

Keywords:academic achievement, affective learning outcome, meta-analysis, problem posing, question posing