期刊目錄列表 - 62卷(2017) - 【教育科學研究期刊】62(1)三月刊

學習的意義感:建立、失落及再創生 作者:黃囇莉(國立臺灣大學心理學系)、洪才舒(國立清華大學學習科學研究所)

卷期:62卷第1期
日期:2017年3月
頁碼:133-162
DOI:doi:10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(1).05

摘要:
本研究旨在探究華人學習意義感之建立、失落及再創生之歷程。研究採用質性研究法,針對17位成人(九位男性和八位女性)進行深度訪談,研究者再以Baumeister(1991)的「意義連結論」、Park與Folkman(1997)的「整體意義」與「情境意義」,以及華人的「讀書文化腳本文化」為形式理論,對受訪者的自我敘說資料二度詮釋並揭露其存在處境的置身結構。資料分析結果顯示,此歷程包含四部分,首先,意義的建立主要透過連結,例如,與自我的連結、與生命及世界信念的連結、與學習信念的連結。接著,意義的失落則來自斷鏈、存在的空虛、與學習信念脫鈎。意義失落後,會將意義暫時擱置,讓自己回歸到現實,設下停損點,並試者去看到未來的各種可能性。最後再藉著轉化與代償而得以再創造新的學習意義感。本研究最後也討論文化之意涵、敘說研究之限制及未來可發展之方向。

關鍵詞:生命意義、華人文化腳本、意義感、學習

《詳全文》 檔名

參考文獻:
  1. 文崇一(1989)。中國人的價值觀。臺北巿:東大圖書。【Wen, C.-Y. (1989). The values of Chinese people. Taipei, Taiwan: Dong Da.】
  2. 王震武(2002)。升學主義的成因及其社會心理基礎-一個歷史觀察。本土心理學研究,17,3-65。doi:10.6254/2002.17.3【Wang, J.-W. (2002). The reason and myth of education fanaticism: A historical review. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 17, 3-65. doi:10.6254/2002.17.3】
  3. 何英奇(1987)。大專學生之生命意義感及其相關:意義治療法基本概念之實證性研究。教育心理學報,20,87-106。doi:10.6251/BEP.19870601.6【Ho, Y.-C. (1987). College students’ meaning of life and its correlates: An empirical study of the concept of logotherapy. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 20, 87-106. doi:10.6251/BEP.19870601.6】
  4. 余安邦(1994)。社會取向成就動機與個我取向成就動機不同嗎?從動機與行為的關係加以探討。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,76,197-224。【Yu, A.-B. (1994). Is social-oriented achievement motivation (SOAM) different from individual-oriented achievement motivation (IOAM)? Further discussions of the relationship between motivation and behavior.  Academia Sinica’s Institute of Ethnology Bulletin, 76, 197-224.】
  5. 余英時(1987)。士與中國文化。上海市:上海人民。【Yu, Y.-S. (1987). The Shi and Chinese culture. Shanghai, China: Shanghai Renmin.】
» 展開更多
中文APA引文格式黃囇莉、洪才舒(2017)。學習的意義感:建立、失落及再創生。教育科學研究期刊62(1),133-162。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(1).05
APA FormatHuang, L.-L. & Hung, T.-S. (2017). Meaning of learning: Construction, loss, and reconstruction. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 62(1), 133-162. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(1).05

Journal directory listing - Volume 62(2017) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【62(1)】March

Meaning of Learning: Construction, Loss, and Reconstruction Author: Li-Li Huang (Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University), Tsai-Shu Hung (Institute of Learning Sciences, National Tsing- Hua University)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 62, No.1
Date:March 2017
Pages:133-162
DOI:doi:10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(1).05

Abstract:

The aim of this study was to explore the processes and mechanisms of the construction, loss, and reconstruction of meaning in the context of learning. A qualitative method was implemented, and 17 adults (9 men and 8 women) were interviewed. Baumeister’s (1991) connection theory of meaning-making, Park and Folkman’s (1997) global meaning and situational meaning theory, and the Chinese cultural script of learning were all adopted as formal theories for the secondary interpretation of the participants’ self-narrative data, and also for the disclosure of the situational structures of existential contexts. The results showed the process to consist of four parts. First, connection is the key mechanism of meaning-building; for example, connecting with oneself/others or with one’s own beliefs about life and the world, or with belief in learning. Second, loss of meaning is a result of disconnection, such as disconnecting from the belief of learning, engendering thoughts about the vacancy of existence. Third, meaning is defined in terms of reality and cost consideration, and being able to see future possibilities. Finally, the reconstruction of meaning results from transformation and compensation. This paper also discusses the implications of culture, the limitations of self-narrative data, and the potential for future research.

Keywords:Chinese cultural script, learning, meaning, meaning of life