期刊目錄列表 - 62卷(2017) - 【教育科學研究期刊】62(2)六月刊

數位學習實驗研究品質評估與現況分析:以行動學習為例 作者:李漢岳(國立臺灣師範大學心測中心)、楊介銘(國立臺灣師範大學心測中心)、宋曜廷(國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系)

卷期:62卷第2期
日期:2017年6月
頁碼:31-60
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(2).02

摘要:
由於近年來行動裝置與教育應用軟體的快速發展,探討行動裝置輔助學習效果的實驗研究大量增加。然而,目前尚缺乏以評估實驗研究品質為主題所進行的回顧性研究。因此,本研究的目的即為廣泛蒐集ERIC和SSCI資料庫自2003年至2013年間,197篇以行動裝置輔助學習的實驗研究,並探討其在實驗設計嚴謹度、統計考驗之過程與結果的正確性,以及成效評估工具的品質等議題。研究結果顯示,實驗設計以準實驗研究占最多數(61%),但有四分之一的準實驗研究未考量實驗組與控制組之起點能力均等性問題。統計結果效度部分則發現,半數以上研究未符合統計基本假設,七成研究所採用之樣本數偏低,使其統計考驗力低落,效果值估計情形未臻精準。成效評估工具品質部分,則發現半數研究者未提供相關的測驗信度與效度資訊。最後,本研究根據研究結果與討論,對未來研究者提出相關建議。

關鍵詞:行動學習、研究品質、實驗設計

《詳全文》 檔名

參考文獻:
  1. 張菀珍、葉榮木(2014)。應用多媒體行動學習系統輔助大學生情緒管理學習成效與評量之探究。教育科學研究期刊,59(4),99-136。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2014.59(4).04【Chang, W.-J., & Yeh, Z.-M. (2014). Exploration of learning effectiveness and assessment of emotion management for college students by using a multimedia mobile learning system. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 59(4), 99-136. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2014.59(4).04】
  2. Ardito, C., Costabile, M. F., de Angeli, A., & Lanzilotti, R. (2012). Enriching archaeological parks with contextual sounds and mobile technology. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 19(4), 1-30. doi:10.1145/2395131.2395136
  3. Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1999). Statistics for psychology (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  4. Basoglu, E. B., & Akdemir, O. (2010). A comparison of undergraduate students English vocabulary learning: Using mobile phones and flash cards. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 1-7. Retrieved from http://www.tojet.net
  5. Bebell, D., & O’Dwyer, L. M. (2010). Educational outcomes and research from 1:1 computing settings. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(1), 5-15. Retrieved from http://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/jtla/article/view/1606
» 展開更多
中文APA引文格式李漢岳、楊介銘、宋曜廷 (2017)。數位學習實驗研究品質評估與現況分析:以行動學習為例。教育科學研究期刊62(2),31-60。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(2).02
APA FormatLee, H.-Y., Yang, J.-M., & Sung, Y.-T. (2017). Quality assessment and situational analysis of experimental e-learning designs: A case study of mobile learning. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 62(2), 31-60. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(2).02

Journal directory listing - Volume 62(2017) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【62(2)】June

Quality Assessment and Situational Analysis of Experimental E-Learning Designs:A Case Study of Mobile Learning Author: Han-Yueh Lee(Research Center for Psychological and Educational Testing, National Taiwan Normal University), Je-Ming Yang(Research Center for Psychological and Educational Testing, National Taiwan Normal University), Yao-Ting Sung(Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling, National Taiwan Normal University)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 62, No.2
Date:June 2017
Pages:31-60
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(2).02

Abstract:

Because of the substantial development of mobile devices and educational software in recent years, the results of mobile learning–based interventions represent a popular research topic for investigation. Although experiment quality is the basis of empirical research, few studies have explored this issue. Thus, the present study investigated the shortfalls in existing experimental research designs related to mobile learning over the past decade and offers suggestions in this paper. The researchers collected data from all 197 experimental studies on mobile learning published in the Education Resources Information Center and Institute of Science Index from 2003 to 2013. The findings of the present study are described as follows: (1) Quasi-experimental designs represent the most frequently used design type (61%); however, among the quasi-experimental studies, 25% did not consider baseline equivalence. (2) Over half of the studies may not have met basic statistical assumptions, and approximately 70% used insufficient sample sizes, leading to low statistical power and imprecise effect size estimation. (3) Half of the studies did not provide information on test reliability and validity. Finally, this paper discusses the results and their implications for future research and practice.

Keywords:experimental design, mobile learning, research quality