期刊目錄列表 - 63卷(2018) - 【教育科學研究期刊】63(2)六月刊(本期專題:終身學習與高齡教育)

(專題)我國高齡教育基本權的憲法基礎探究:終身學習權保障觀點 作者:中國文化大學教育學院師資培育中心王等元

卷期:63卷第2期
日期:2018年6月
頁碼:1-24
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.201806_63(2).0001

摘要:
個別基本權利功能及其憲法保障基礎的探究是基本權利理論研究的重要問題;故本研究從終身學習權保障觀點出發,並以教育憲法釋義學方法,試圖探究我國新興高齡教育基本權功能及其憲法保障基礎。本研究發現,為因應臺灣高齡社會發展趨勢,高齡教育基本權利應屬國民教育基本權與大學學術自由以外的新興教育基本權利,其憲法保障的基礎為我國立國精神之憲法基本原則、憲法第22條「概括基本權利」,以及基本國策相關規定;其次,我國高齡教育基本權應具有防禦權功能、客觀價值秩序功能、制度性保障功能,以及組織與程序功能;最後,就其基本權功能而言,除防禦權功能外,其餘應屬基本權客觀法規範功能,旨在課予國家積極提供高齡學習機會之作為義務,以協助人民實現其高齡教育基本權利。

關鍵詞:在地老化、高齡社會、高齡教育、教育基本權、終身學習權

《詳全文》 檔名

參考文獻:
  1. 朱芬郁(2015)。高齡學習者老化態度之研究─以中國、澳門、新加坡及臺灣為例。國立空中大學社會科學學報,22,1-27。【Chu, F.-Y. (2015). A case study on the attitudes towards aging of senior learners in China, Macau, Singapore and Taiwan. Journal of Social Science, 22, 1-27.】
  2. 行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996)。教育改革總諮議報告書。臺北市:作者。【Educational Reform Commission, Executive Yuan (1996). Educational reform summary report. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
  3. 余書麟(1978)。國民教育權。新竹市:新竹師專。【Yu, S.-L. (1978). The right to primary and junior education. Hsinchu, Taiwan: Hsinchu Teacher Junior College.】
  4. 吳庚(2003)。憲法的解釋與適用。臺北市:三民。【Wu, G. (2003). Constitution interpretation and application. Taipei, Taiwan: Sanmin.】
  5. 吳明烈(2012)。我國推動高齡學習的幾項重要思考。成人及終身教育,38,23-31。【Wu, M.-L. (2012). Key issues on the development of elder learning in Taiwan. Adult and Lifelong Education Bimonthly, 38, 23-31.】
» 展開更多
中文APA引文格式王等元(2018)。我國高齡教育基本權的憲法基礎探究:終身學習權保障觀點。教育科學研究期刊,63(2),1-24。doi:10.6209/JORIES.201806_63(2).0001
APA FormatWang, D. -Y. (2018). Study of the Constitutional Foundations of the Right to Senior Education in Taiwan: A Lifelong-Learning-Right Perspective Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 63(2), 1-24. doi:10.6209/JORIES.201806_63(2).0001
 

Journal directory listing - Volume 63(2018) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【63(2)】June (Special Issue: Lifelong Learning and Senior Education)

(Special Issue) Study of the Constitutional Foundations of the Right to Senior Education in Taiwan: A Lifelong-Learning-Right Perspective Author: Deng-Yuan Wang (Center of Teacher Education, Chinese Culture University)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 63, No.2
Date:June 2018
Pages:1-24
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.201806_63(2).0001

Abstract:
Discussions of individual basic rights and their constitutional protection are fundamental to research into basic rights theory. This paper aims at explicating the functions of the basic right to senior education and its constitutional rationale through interpretative epistemology of the Constitution from a lifelong-learning-right perspective. The research findings are as follows: (1) In global aging societies, the basic right to senior education is a relatively new right to education, and its constitutional rationale can be derived from articles 11 and 22 of the Constitution. (2) The functions of the basic right to senior education are the defensive function, objective values function, institutional protection function, and organizational and procedural function. (3) Except for the first function, the others are new basic-right functions, which impose the state obligations to help the older adults benefit from the right to senior education. On the basis of these findings, some suggestions for policy decision-makers and future research are provided.

Keywords:aging in place, aged society, basic right to education, right to lifelong learning, senior education