期刊目錄列表 - 63卷(2018) - 【教育科學研究期刊】63(4)十二月刊(本期專題:素養的教育實踐)

(專題)十二年國教國中階段自然科學領域素養導向評量試題之開發與初探 作者:國立臺灣師範大學科學教育中心林蓓伶、國立臺灣師範大學地球科學系暨研究所心理與教育測驗研究發展中心潘昌志、國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系心理與教育測驗研究發展中心蘇少祖、國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系學習科學跨國頂尖研究中心陳柏熹

卷期:63卷第4期
日期:2018年12月
頁碼:295-337
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0010

摘要:
為承接十二年國教自然科學領域課程綱要素養導向精神,此研究目的為研發與初探具信、效度之自然科學領域素養導向評量試題。本研究歷程包含三大部分:一、梳理與歸納文獻中科學素養之意涵;二、細緻化編碼自然科學領域課程綱要中國民中學階段核心素養具體內涵,以自然科學領域課程綱要國民中學階段核心素養具體內涵為架構,建立科學素養導向題型命題參考架構;三、以自然科學領域課程綱要國民中學階段核心素養具體內涵編碼表及命題參考架構,研發自然科學素養導向題型。並根據科學素養導向試題命題參考架構,針對鑑別度欠佳之試題,進行後設分析,進而達到試題修正之功效。由結果分析得知,依此科學素養導向試題命題參考架構所命之試題,除能明確對應自然科學領域課程綱要中之國民中學階段核心素養具體內涵與學習重點,大致有良好之品質。對於品質待改進之試題,科學素養導向命題參考架構亦能提供明確之修改方向,幫助命題者進一步檢視與修正。本研究所提出之科學素養導向命題參考架構,可供未來作為命題時梳理課綱內涵與學習重點之清晰分類架構,並確保試題所欲評量之能力與內容呼應課綱素養精神。同時,亦能作為後續試題修改分析之明確參考方向,用以整體系統性開發、修正並歸類各式評量工具,以期作為未來相關領域學者及教師發展評量工具與進行教學設計之參考。

關鍵詞:十二年國民基本教育、科學素養、科學素養導向試題

《詳全文》 檔名

參考文獻:
  1. 任宗浩(2007)。評量架構。載於張俊彥(主編),TIMSS 2007國際數學與科學教育成就趨勢調查(pp. 13-63)。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學。 【Jen, T.-H, J. (2007). Assessment framework. In C.-Y. Chang (Ed.), TIMSS 2007 trends in international mathematics and science study (pp. 13-63). Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan Normal University.】
  2. 李文旗、張俊彥(2005)。中學生應達到的地球科學素養?─中學地科老師的觀點。師大學報:科學教育類,50(2),1-27。doi:10.6300/JNTNU.2005.50(2).01 【Lee, W.-C., & Chang, C.-Y. (2005). Taiwan’s secondary school teachers’ expectations with regard to the earth science literacy of their students. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Mathematics & Science Education, 50(2), 1-27. doi:10.6300/JNTNU.2005.50(2).01】
  3. 宋曜廷、周業太、曾芬蘭(2014)。十二年國民基本教育的入學考試與評量變革。教育科學研究期刊59(1),1-32。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2014.59(1).01 【Sung, Y.-T., Chou, Y.-T., & Tseng, F.-L. (2014). Standards-based assessments for 12-year basic education in Taiwan. Journal of Research in Education Sciences59(1), 1-32. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2014.59(1).01】
  4. 林宜平、吳亭亭、黎雅如、周桂田、鄭尊仁(2010)。台灣成年民眾對奈米產品與科技的公眾感知。台灣公共衛生雜誌,29(5),431-439。doi:10.6288/TJPH2010-29-05-0 【Lin, Y.-P., Wu, T.-T., Li, Y.-R., Chou, K.-T., & Cheng, T.-J. (2010). Perceptions of nano-products and nanotechnology by Taiwanese adults. Taiwan Journal of Public Health, 29(5), 431-439. doi:10.6288/TJPH 2010-29-05-06】
  5. 施琮仁(2015)。不同媒體平台對公眾參與科學決策能力之影響:以奈米科技為例。新聞學研究,124,165-213 【Shih, T.-J. (2015). Media and public ability to participate in scientific decision-making: Using nanotechnology as a case study. Mass Communication Reserch, 124, 165-213.】
» 展開更多
中文APA引文格式林蓓伶、潘昌志、蘇少祖、陳柏熹(2018)。十二年國教國中階段自然科學領域素養導向評量試題之開發與初探。教育科學研究期刊,63(4),295-337。doi:10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0010
APA FormatLin, P.-L., Pan, C.-C., Su, S.-Z., & Chen, P.-H. (2018). Development of assessments for scientific literacy based on curriculum guidelines for 12-year basic-education in science domains. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 63(4), 295-337. doi:10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0010

Journal directory listing - Volume 63(2018) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【63(4)】December (Special Issue: The Concepts and Practices for Achieving Literacy)

(Special Issue) Development of Assessments for Scientific Literacy Based on Curriculum Guidelines for 12-Year Basic-Education in Science Domains Author: Pei-Ling Lin (Science Education Centre, National Taiwan Normal University), Chang-Chih Pan (Department of Earth Sciences,Research Center for Psychological and Educational Testing, National Taiwan Normal University), Shao-Zu Su (Department of Educational Psychology & Counseling, Research Center for Psychological and Educational Testing, National Taiwan Normal University), Po-Hsi Chen (Department of Educational Psychology & Counseling, Institute for Research Excellence in Learning Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 63, No.4
Date:December 2018
Pages:295-337
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0010

Abstract:
The purpose of this research is to analyse the curriculum guidelines in science domains within the 12-year Basic Education and to explore and develop a reliable and valid assessment model for scientific literacy. This study is conducted in three parts: First, the definitions of scientific literacy that are established in the literature are classified and examined. Second, a coding list is established by decoding the implications of the curriculum guidelines in the science domains, and this decoded result is supported by examining the definitions of scientific literacy from the literature. A unified assessment framework is established for drafting scientific literacy-oriented exam questions. Third, the coding list and assessment framework are used to develop scientific literacy-oriented exam questions, and based on this framework, a meta-analysis of unqualified exam questions is conducted to revise these exam questions. The aforementioned coding list and assessment framework are used to develop and test the scientific literacy-oriented exam questions. The results indicates that most of the scientific literacy-oriented exam questions developed in this study have good quality and follow the curriculum guidelines of the 12-Year Basic Education in science domains. Regarding the unqualified exam questions, the assessment framework for scientific literacy developed in this study provides recommendations for revision, which can help draft and correct exam questions. In sum, the proposed assessment framework for scientific literacy can be used to further develop, modify, and classify various assessment tools and as a reference for future teachers and researchers.

Keywords:12-year basic-education, assessment for scientific literacy, scientific literacy