師大學報 - 教育科學研究期刊 - 期刊目錄列表 - 64卷(2019) - 【教育科學研究期刊】64(3)九月刊（本期專題：創造力、STEAM與自造教育）

以作者名、篇名、關鍵字或DOI查詢

CONTRIBUTORS
NOTICE

[Guide for Submission]

稿約

[Style for Thesis Writing]

論文撰寫體例

[Review of Research Papers]

論文審查要點

[The Copyright]

著作權處理要點

[Flow of Review System]

審查制度流程

[Regulations Governing]

編審委員會設置要點

[Editorial Board]

本年度編審委員

[Advisory Board]

本年度諮詢委員

[Form Download]

相關表單下載

《教育科學研究期刊》「多元視角詮釋J. Bruner跨科際的教育科學研究之傳承」專題徵稿(截稿日至2025/06/30) 《教育科學研究期刊》「體驗與冒險教育」專題徵稿(截稿日至112/12/31) 賀《教育科學研究期刊》榮獲2019-2021年科技部臺灣人文及社會科學期刊評比收錄於第一級核心期刊!

期刊目錄列表 - 64卷(2019) - 【教育科學研究期刊】64(3)九月刊（本期專題：創造力、STEAM與自造教育）

回上一頁

（專題）調適性與創新性創造力之評量作者:國立臺灣師範大學工業教育學系暨學習科學跨國頂尖研究中心洪榮昭、國立臺灣師範大學工業教育學系暨學習科學跨國頂尖研究中心戴凱欣、國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系暨學習科學跨國頂尖研究中心陳柏熹、國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系暨學習科學跨國頂尖研究中心蘇少祖

卷期：64卷第3期
日期：2019年9月
頁碼：143-168
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.201909_64(3).0006

摘要：
創意的量測一直是近代實證研究的主題，最突出的是托倫斯的創造性思維測驗（TTCT），這些創造力評量工具大多強調擴散性思考的評量，對聚斂性思考較少著墨。本研究開發一個可同時應用擴散性與聚斂性思考的圖像量測工具──「圖繪展開創意評量」，以圖片取代傳統反應量表，並可用來測量調適性創造力及創新性創造力。本研究的研究對象為332位參與創造力發展課程的教師，其中有效樣本為324筆，並以此進行研究假設驗證。研究結果顯示，這兩種類型呈現負相關。創新性創造力中除了原創性思維外，另外三個創新性思維類型：多向性思維、異類思維及逆向思維皆呈正相關。調適性創造力中的同類性思維與豐富化思維兩者呈正相關。研究結果顯示，女性在創新性創造力方面的表現優於男性，較年輕的受試者表現優於比較年長的受試者，但在調適性創造力方面，只有30歲以下的受試者表現優於40歲以上的受試者。本研究建議「圖繪展開創意評量」可用於評量個體的創新性創造力與調適性創造力，是一種能同時評量擴散性思考與聚斂性思考的評量工具。

關鍵詞：調適性創造力、聚斂性思考、創造力評量、擴散性思考、創新性創造力

《詳全文》

參考文獻：

Abdulla, A. M., & Cramond, B. (2017). After six decades of systematic study of creativity: What do teachers need to know about what it is and how it is measured. Roeper Review, 39(1), 9-23. doi:10.1080/02783193.2016.1247398
Ai, X. (1999). Creativity and academic achievement: An investigation of gender differences. Creativity Research Journal, 12(4), 329-337. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1204_11
Albert, R. S. (1996). Some reasons why childhood creativity often fails to make it past puberty into the real world. New Directions in Child Development, 72, 43-56. doi:10.1002/cd.23219967205
Althuizen, N., Wierenga, B., & Rossiter, J. (2010). The validity of two brief measures of creative ability. Creativity Research Journal, 22(1), 53-61. doi:10.1080/10400410903579577
Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood- creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134(6), 779-806. doi:10.1037/a0012815

» 展開更多

Abdulla, A. M., & Cramond, B. (2017). After six decades of systematic study of creativity: What do teachers need to know about what it is and how it is measured. Roeper Review, 39(1), 9-23. doi:10.1080/02783193.2016.1247398
Ai, X. (1999). Creativity and academic achievement: An investigation of gender differences. Creativity Research Journal, 12(4), 329-337. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1204_11
Albert, R. S. (1996). Some reasons why childhood creativity often fails to make it past puberty into the real world. New Directions in Child Development, 72, 43-56. doi:10.1002/cd.23219967205
Althuizen, N., Wierenga, B., & Rossiter, J. (2010). The validity of two brief measures of creative ability. Creativity Research Journal, 22(1), 53-61. doi:10.1080/10400410903579577
Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood- creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134(6), 779-806. doi:10.1037/a0012815
Baer, J. (1993). Creativity and divergent thinking: A task specific approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2008). Gender differences in creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 75-105. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01289.x
Benedek, M., Franz, F., Heene, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2012). Differential effects of cognitive inhibition and intelligence on creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(4), 480-485. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.014
Benedek, M., & Jauk, E. (2014). Creativity: Lost in simplification? Creativity, Theories, Research, Applications, 1(2), 213-219. doi:10.15290/ctra.2014.01.02.06
Boden, M. A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. London, UK: Routledge.
Bradley, F., Gao, Y., & Sousa, C. M. P. (2013). A natural science approach to investigate cross-cultural managerial creativity. International Business Review, 22(5), 839-855. doi:10. 1016/j.ibusrev.2013.01.006
Brophy, D. R. (2001). Comparing the attributes, activities, and performance of divergent, convergent, and combination thinkers. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3&4), 439-455. doi:10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_20
Castillo-Vergara, M., Galleguillos, N. B., Cuello, L. J., Alvarez-Marin, A., & Acuña-Opazo, C. (2018). Does socioeconomic status influence student creativity? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 142-152. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2018.07.005
Chang, Y.-S., Chien, Y.-H., Yu, K.-C., Lin, H.-C., & Chen, M. Y.-C. (2016). Students’ innovative environmental perceptions and creative performances in cloud-based m-learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 988-994. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.032
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
Cropley, A. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 391-404. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1803_13
Davis, G. A. (1999). Creativity is forever. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
Diamond, A. M. (1986). The life-cycle research productivity of mathematicians and scientists. Journal of Gerontology, 41(4), 520-525. doi:10.1093/geronj/41.4.520
Diamond, M. C. (2001). Good news about the aging brain. San Francisco, CA: American Society on Aging.
Dollinger, S. J., & Shafran, M. (2005). Note on consensual assessment technique in creativity research. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 100(3), 592-598. doi:10.2466/pms.100.3.592-598
Dziedziewicz, D., Oledzka, D., & Karwowski, M. (2013). Developing 4- to 6-year-old children’s figural creativity using a doodle-book program. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 85-95. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2012.09.004
Feist, G. J. (2010). The function of personality in creativity: The nature and nurture of the creative personality. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 113-130). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1001-1013. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1001
Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2005). Effects of motivational cues on perceptual asymmetry: Implications for creativity and analytical problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2), 263-275. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.263
Fritz, R. (1991). Creating. New York, NY: Fawcett Columbine.
Frosch, K. H. (2011). Workforce age and innovation: A literature survey. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(4), 414-430. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00298.x
Gabora, L., & Kaufman, S. B. (2010). Evolutionary approaches to creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 279-300). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444-454. doi:10.1037/h0063487
Guildford, J. P. (1957). Creative abilities in the arts. Psychological Review, 64(2), 110-118. doi:10. 1037/h0048280
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
He, W. J., & Wong, W. C. (2011). Gender differences in creative thinking revisited: Findings from analysis of variability. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(7), 807-811. doi:10.1016/j. paid.2011.06.027
Hermann, N. (1988). Whole brain activity. In R. L. Kuhn (Ed.), Handbook for creative and innovative managers (pp. 55-59). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Hsiao, C.-C. (2017). Longitudinal research on in-service trainee teachers development of self-efficacy for creative teaching. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 62(3), 25-55. doi:10.6209/jories.2017.62(3).02
Hughes, D. J., Furnham, A., & Batey, M. (2013). The structure and personality predictors of self-rated creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 76-84. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2012.10.001
Isaksen, S. G., & Lauer, K. J. (2002). The climate for creativity and change in teams. Creativity and Innovation Management Journal, 11(1), 74-86. doi:10.1111/1467-8691.00238
Isaksen, S. G., & Treffinger, D. J. (1987). Creative problem solving: Three components and six specific stages. Buffalo, NY: Center for Studies in Creativity.
Kapoor, H. (2019). Sex differences and similarities in negative creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 142, 238-241. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2018.04.043
Karakelle, S. (2009). Enhancing fluent and flexible thinking through the creative drama process. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4(2), 124-129. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2009.05.002
Kaufmann, G. (2003). What to measure? A new look at the concept of creativity. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 235-251. doi:10.1080/00313830308604
Kharkhurin, A. V., & Motalleebi, S. N. S. (2008). The impact of culture on the creative potential of American, Russian, and Iranian college students. Creativity Research Journal, 20(4), 404-411. doi:10.1080/10400410802391835
Kim, J., & Michael, W. B. (1995). The relationship of creativity measures to school achievement and to preferred learning and thinking style in a sample of Korean high school students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(1), 60-74. doi:10.1177/0013164495055001006
Kim, K. H., Cramond, B., & VanTassel-Baska, J. (2010). The relationship between creativity and intelligence. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 395-412). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511763205.025
Kirton, M. J. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(5), 622-629. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.61.5.622
Kirton, M. J. (1987). Adaptors and innovators: Cognitive style and personality. In S. G. Isaksen (Ed.), Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basics (pp. 282-304). Buffalo, NY: Bearly Limited.
Kirton, M. J. (1999). Kirton adaption-innovation inventory manual. Berkhamstead, UK: Occupational Research Centre.
Kirton, M. J. (2003). Adaption-innovation: In the context of diversity and change. London, UK: Routledge.
Kleibeuker, S. W., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Crone, E. A. (2013). The development of creative cognition across adolescence: Distinct trajectories for insight and divergent thinking. Developmental Science, 16(1), 2-12. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01176.x
Kraft, U. (2005). Unleashing creativity. Scientific American Mind, 16(1), 16-23. doi:10.1038/ scientificamericanmind0405-16
Lee, C.-S., & Therriault, D. J. (2013). The cognitive underpinnings of creative thought: A latent variable analysis exploring the roles of intelligence and working memory in three creative thinking processes. Intelligence, 41(5), 306-320. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2013.04.008
Leutner, F., Yearsley, A., Codreanu, S.-C., Borenstein, Y., & Ahmetoglu, G. (2017). From Likert scales to images: Validating a novel creativity measure with image based response scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 36-40. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.007
Liang, C., Chang, C.-C., & Hsu, Y. (2014). Differential effects of personality traits and environmental predictors on reproductive and creative imagination. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 48(4), 237-253. doi:10.1002/jocb.50
Liu, Z., Zhang, J., Xie, X., Rolls, E. T., Sun, J., Zhang, K., …Feng, J. (2018). Neural and genetic determinants of creativity. NeuroImage, 174, 164-176. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.067
Luecke, R., & Katz, R. (2003). Managing creativity and innovation. Boston, MA: Havard Business School Press.
Mouchiroud, C., & Lubart, T. (2001). Children’s original thinking: An empirical examination of alternative measures derived from divergent thinking tasks. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 162(4), 382-401. doi:10.1080/00221320109597491
Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2-3), 107-120. doi:10.1080/10400419.2003.9651403
Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2008). The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 392-423. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.392
Nicholls, J. G. (1972). Creativity in the person who will never produce anything original and useful: The concept of creativity as a normally distributed trait. American Psychologist, 27(8), 717-727. doi:10.1037/h0033180
Norlander, T., Erixon, A., & Archer, T. (2000). Psychological androgyny and creativity: Dynamics of gender-role and personality trait. Social Behavior and Personality: An international Journal, 28(5), 423-435. doi:10.2224/sbp.2000.28.5.423
Osborn, A. F. (1952). Wake up your mind: 101 ways to develop creativeness. New York, NY: Scribners.
Parnes, S. J. (1992). Sourcebook for creative problem solving. Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation Press.
Petrowski, M. J. (2000). Creativity research: Implications for teaching, learning and thinking. Reference Services Review, 28(4), 304-312. doi:10.1108/00907320010359623
Plsek, P. E. (1997). Creativity, innovation, and quality. Milwaukee, WI: ASQ Quality Press.
Plucker, J. A., & Makel, M. C. (2010). Assessment of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 48-73). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Rosa, J. A., Qualls, W. J., & Ruth, J. A. (2014). Consumer creativity: Effects of gender and variation in the richness of vision and touch inputs. Journal of Business Research, 67(3), 386-393. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.023
Rossman, J. (1931). The psychology of the inventor: A study of the patentee. Washington, DC: Inventors.
Runco, M. A. (2010). Divergent thinking, creativity, and ideation. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 413-446). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511763205.026
Runco, M. A., & Charles, R. E. (1993). Judgments of originality and appropriateness as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 15(5), 537-546. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(93)90337-3
Simonton, D. K. (1988). Age and outstanding achievement: What do we know after a century of research? Psychological Bulletin, 104(2), 251-267. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.104.2.251
Smolucha, L. W., & Smolucha, F. C. (1985). A fifth Piagetian stage: The collaboration between analogical and logical thinking in artistic creativity. Visual Arts Research, 11(2), 90-99.
Sternberg, R. J. (2012). The assessment of creativity: An investment-based approach. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 3-12. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.652925
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51(7), 677-688. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.7.677
Takeuchi, H., & Kawashima, R. (2018). Mean diffusivity in the dopaminergic system and neural differences related to dopaminergic system. Current Neuropharmacology, 16(4), 460-474. doi:10.2174/1570159X15666171109124839
Torrance, E. P. (1966). The Torrance tests of creative thinking-norms technical manual research edition-verbal tests, forms A and B figural tests, forms A and B. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.
Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-technical manual. Lexington, MA: Personnel Press.
Torrance, E. P. (1979). The search for satori and creativity. New York, NY: Creative Education Foundation.
Torrance, E. P. (1993). Understanding creativity: Where to start? Psychological Inquiry, 4(3), 232- 234. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0403_17
Torrance, E. P. (1995). Insights about creativity: Questioned, rejected, ridiculed, ignored. Educational Psychology Review, 7(3), 313-322. doi:10.1007/BF02213376
Torrance, E. P. (1998). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-technical manual figural (streamlined) forms A & B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
Treffinger, D. J. (2009). Myth 5: Creativity is too difficult to measure. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(4), 245-247. doi:10.1177/0016986209346829
Urban, K. K., & Jellen, H. R. (1996). Test for creative thinking-drawing production (TCT-DP). Lisse, the Netherland: Swets and Zeitlinger.
Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. London, UK: Watts.
Wang, H.-C. (2019). The influence of creative task engagement on English L2 learners’ negotiation of meaning in oral communication tasks. System, 80, 83-94. doi:10.1016/j.system.2018.10.015
Wu, C.-H., Cheng, Y., Ip, H. M., & McBride-Chang, C. (2005). Age differences in creativity: Task structure and knowledge base. Creativity Research Journal, 17(4), 321-326. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1704_3
Zabelina, D. L., Friedman, N. P., & Andrews-Hanna, J. (2019). Unity and diversity of executive functions in creativity. Consciousness and Cognition, 68, 47-56. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2018.12.005

中文APA引文格式	洪榮昭、戴凱欣、陳柏熹、蘇少祖（2019）。調適性與創新性創造力之評量。教育科學研究期刊，64（3），143-168。doi:10.6209/JORIES.201909_64(3).0006
APA Format	Hong, J.-C., Tai, K.-H., Chen, P.-H., & Su, S.-Z.(2019). Revolutionary Drawing: Measuring Adaptive and Innovative Creativity. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 64(3), 143-168. doi:10.6209/JORIES.201909_64(3).0006

Journal directory listing - Volume 64 (2019) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【64(3)】September (Special Issue: Creativity, STEAM and Maker Education)

Top

(Special Issue) Revolutionary Drawing: Measuring Adaptive and Innovative Creativity Author: Jon-Chao Hong (Department of Industrial Education/ Institute for Research Excellence in Learning Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University), Kai-Hsin Tai (Department of Industrial Education/ Institute for Research Excellence in Learning Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University), Po-Hsi Chen (Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling/ Institute for Research Excellence in Learning Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University), Shao-Zu Su (Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling/ Institute for Research Excellence in Learning Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University)

Vol.&No.：Vol. 64, No.3
Date： September 2019
Pages：143-168
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.201909_64(3).0006

Abstract：
Creativity measurement has been the subject of empirical research for decades, with the most prominent notions about the creative process being Torrance’s Tests on Creative Thinking (TTCT). However, those studies focused on divergent thinking measurement. To integrate divergent and convergent thinking measurements, the present study developed a novel image-based creativity measure, named “revolutionary drawing,” in which images replace the conventional response scale, to examine the interrelatedness of creative thinking types: adaptive creativity or innovative creativity. The target sample of this study was 332 teachers who had joined the creative development program, from whom 324 valid data were collected for analysis to test the hypotheses. Our evidence indicated that the two types of creativity were negatively correlated. Moreover, three of the four sub-abilities of innovative creativity, cross-category, multiple-direction, and reverse thinking, were positively inter-correlated. Only originality thinking, the fourth sub-ability of innovative creativity, was not correlated to the other three sub-abilities of innovative creativity. The two sub-abilities of adaptive creativity, diffusive thinking and enriched thinking, were positively correlated. The results of this study revealed that females performed better than males with respect to age differences in innovative creativity. The younger participants performed better than the older participants, but on adaptive creativity, only participants aged under 30 performed better than participants aged 40 and over. The findings of this study suggest that revolutionary drawing could be used for testing innovative creativity and adaptive creativity as cognitive processes for divergent and convergent thinking.

Keywords：adaptive creativity, convergent thinking, creativity assessment, divergent thinking, innovative creativity

本網站獲「科技部人文社會科學研究中心」補助

地址：臺北市大安區和平東路一段162號國立臺灣師範大學圖書館出版中心

電話：(02)7749-5279

CONTRIBUTORSNOTICE

期刊目錄列表 - 64卷(2019) - 【教育科學研究期刊】64(3)九月刊（本期專題：創造力、STEAM與自造教育） 回上一頁

Journal directory listing - Volume 64 (2019) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【64(3)】September (Special Issue: Creativity, STEAM and Maker Education) Top

CONTRIBUTORS
NOTICE

期刊目錄列表 - 64卷(2019) - 【教育科學研究期刊】64(3)九月刊（本期專題：創造力、STEAM與自造教育）

回上一頁

Journal directory listing - Volume 64 (2019) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【64(3)】September (Special Issue: Creativity, STEAM and Maker Education)

Top