期刊目錄列表 - 64卷(2019) - 【教育科學研究期刊】64(4)十二月刊

設計思考融入職前師資培育課程之實施與成效:以適性教學為例 作者:南臺學校財團法人南臺科技大學教育領導與評鑑研究所暨師資培育中心王佳琪、國立中山大學人文暨科技跨領域學士學位學程宋世祥

卷期:64卷第4期
日期:2019年12月
頁碼:145-173
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.201912_64(4).0006

摘要:
「適性教學」在職前師資培育課程中是相當重要的科目,目的在於培育師資生能以學生的需求為出發點,達到適性揚才的目的,培養其在教學現場能因應學生個別差異以進行差異化教學。本研究主要探討設計思考融入職前師資培育課程的價值,從師生觀點分析設計思考對學生學習狀況與學習成效的影響;另外,再從教學者的觀點反思融入課程對教師專業成長及學生學習成效之影響。研究對象為一名教學者及30名師資培育學生。研究工具使用「學生自我效能評估表」、「學生學習興趣量表」、「學生核心能力評分表」等量化工具;另外,亦蒐集教學者的「教學研究日誌」、「學生作業及札記」等質性資料進行分析。在資料處理與分析部分,採用相依樣本t檢定來檢驗學生教學前、後之自我效能和學習興趣的表現,並透過教師教學研究日誌、學生作業及札記,以及學生核心能力評分表等資料,探討以設計思考融入職前師資培育課程中對教師教學及學生學習的影響,最後提供未來類似課程之教學建議。

關鍵詞:師資培育、設計思考、適性教學

《詳全文》 檔名

參考文獻:
  1. 王為國(2004)。適性教學的回顧與展望。課程與教學季刊,8(1),97-110。doi:10.6384/CIQ. 200501.0097 【Wang, W.-K. (2004). The reviews and prospects of the adaptive instruction. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 8(1), 97-110. doi:10.6384/CIQ.200501.0097】
  2. 李美華、王政華(2014)。培養學生未來想像與創造能力─簡介IDEO設計思考模式。臺灣教育評論月刊,3(6),28-30。 【Lee, M.-H., & Wang, Z.-H. (2014). Cultivate students’ future imagination and creativity - Introduction to IDEO design thinking mode. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 3(6), 28-30.】
  3. 李雅雯、陳書榕(2012)。提升自我、持續學習,讓企業搶著要你!經理人月刊。取自https://www.managertoday.com.tw/articles/view/13758 【Lee, Y.-W., & Chen, S.-R. (2012). Improve yourself, continue to learn, and let the company rush to ask you! Manager’s Monthly. Retrieved from https://www.managertoday.com.tw/articles/ view/13758】
  4. 吳清山(2018)。素養導向教師教育內涵建構及實踐之研究。教育科學研究期刊,63(4),261-293。doi:10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0009 【Wu, C.-S. (2018). Construction and practice of competency-based teacher education. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 63(4), 261-293. doi:10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0009】
  5. 林延諭、鄭夢慈(2016)。融入設計思考於嚴肅教育遊戲的設計歷程及對科技學科教學知識的影響:以職前教師為例。數位學習科技期刊,8(1),71-94。 【Lin, Y.-Y., & Cheng, M.-T. (2016). The integration of design thinking into the process of developing a serious educational game and its influence on technological pedagogical content knowledge: Taking the case of a pre-service teacher as an example. International Journal on Digital Learning Technology, 8(1), 71-94.】
» 展開更多
中文APA引文格式王佳琪、宋世祥(2019)。設計思考融入職前師資培育課程之實施與成效:以適性教學為例。教育科學研究期刊,64(4),145-173。doi:10.6209/JORIES.201912_64(4).0006
APA FormatWang, C.-C. & Sung, S.-H.(2019). The “adaptive instruction” course as an example of the application and evaluation of a teacher education program course incorporating design thinking. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 64(4), 145-173. doi:10.6209/JORIES.201912_64(4).0006

Journal directory listing - Volume 64(2019) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【64(4)】December

The “Adaptive Instruction” Course as an Example of the Application and Evaluation of a Teacher Education Program Course Incorporating Design Thinking Author: Chia-Chi Wang (Graduate Institute of Educational Leadership and Evaluation/Center for Teacher Education, Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology), Shih-Hsiang Sung (Program in Interdisciplinary Studies, National Sun Yat-sen University)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 64, No.4
Date:December 2019
Pages:145-173
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.201912_64(4).0006

Abstract:
The current study assessed the impact of integrating design thinking into the process of teaching the adaptive instruction course central to a teacher education program. Action research was also incorporated to enhance teaching quality and learning performance. The first purpose of this study was to explore students’ self-efficacy, learning interest, problem-solving ability, team cooperation, and learning performance in the teacher education courses incorporating design thinking. The second purpose of this study was to use “the arrangement of the teaching program,” “the construction of the learning atmosphere,” “the planning of class management,” and “multiple evaluations” as four indexes to explore the teaching effectiveness of the course. Participants in this study were one teacher and 30 preservice teachers taking courses in teacher education. As instruments, we used a self-evaluated checklist of self-efficacy for students and a learning interest scale for students. Moreover, the teaching and reflection journals and student reports in class were included in our investigation. The data analysis methods included paired-samples t test for quantitative analysis and qualitative analysis of interviews, observations, and audio-visual recordings. In addition, suggestions for further study are proposed.

Keywords:adaptive instruction, design thinking, teacher education