期刊目錄列表 - 65卷(2020) - 【教育科學研究期刊】65(1)三月刊

從教師認知、教學資源與教學實踐論國語文教育政策之困境與契機 作者:國家教育研究院原住民族教育研究中心陳茹玲、國立清華大學教育與學習科技學系柯華葳、國立臺北教育大學臺灣文化研究所蔡佩眞

卷期:65卷第1期
日期:2020年3月
頁碼:47-91
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.202003_65(1).0003

摘要:
本研究以12名中學國語文教師為研究對象,就教師認知、教學資源與教學實踐三個面向,進行結構化深度訪談,將所得資料轉譯為口語報告,再進行編碼與歸類分析。期透過教育理想與教育現場兩方對話,對語文教育政策之落實現況更深入理解,並據此提出國語文教育的政策建議。本研究結果顯示:一、教師最關注教師專業,具備高省思與評鑑能力,期待專業成長,盼望將所學轉化運用於課室。不過,教育單位提供的精進課程未能符合需求,在進行時也欠缺適當配套措施,且未能有足夠時間讓教師轉化所學,影響落實的成效。二、國語文課綱揭示的素養有關概念已內化為教師認知,但高層次概念較少被提及。三、各校硬體資源分配不平均,教學運用上仍可再精進。教學文本趨精美多元,但選文未符整體性、脈絡化與多元化,且教師對教材有較大依賴性,少數自編教材亦較少納入核心素養。四、現場教學活動多元,趨向學習者中心。但學生能力、評量與家長期待等因素,影響新式教學的落實。綜上,本研究對國語文教育建議如下:一、植基於教師專業知能與專業成長期待,規劃精進課程,提供課務協助有關配套措施,並培養轉化能力。二、將教師教學想像與更高層次的課綱目標連結,以有效落實課綱精神。三、善用教師的專業與教學經驗,改善教科書選文,同時鼓勵教師教材編撰,使其更系統、多元,符合學生經驗與課綱精神。四、將課綱揭示的高層次能力與評量結合,使教學朝向政策目標,同時增加素養教學意義之社會宣導,以協助教師更順利達成素養教學的目標。

關鍵詞:教師認知、教學資源、教學實踐、語文教育政策、課程綱要

《詳全文》 檔名

參考文獻:
  1. 方正一、洪志成(2013)。指派教師研習與學校對策間的拉扯:教師專業觀點。嘉大教育研究學刊,30,97-122。 【Fang, Z.-Y., & Hung, C.-C. (2013). The tugs between administrators and teachers who were compelled to participate in in-service training from the perspectives of teacher profession. National Chiayi University Journal of the Educational Research, 30, 97-122.】
  2. 王基倫(2015)。國語文教學現場的省思。臺北市:萬卷樓。 【Wang, C.-L. (2015). Thinking in the mandarin teaching scene. Taipei, Taiwan: Wan Juan Book.】
  3. 吳忠宏、廖麗卿、林政逸(2013)。國中國文教科書環境教育議題之內容分析。臺中教育大學學報:教育類,27(2),1-26。 【Wu, C.-H., Liao, L.-C., & Lin, J.-Y. (2013). A study on the environmental education issues within the Chinese literature textbooks of junior high schools: Content analysis approach. Journal of National Taichung University: Education, 27(2), 1-26.】
  4. 吳清山(2018)。素養導向教師教育內涵建構及實踐之研究。教育科學研究期刊,63(4),261-293。doi:10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0009 【Wu, C.-S. (2018). Construction and practice of competency-based teacher education. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 63(4), 261-293. doi:10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0009】
  5. 李涵鈺、楊國揚(2017)。數位教科書教學設計之現況與問題探討。清華教育學報,34(1),71-104。doi:10.3966/252190062017063401003 【Li, H.-Y., & Yang, K.-Y. (2017). Current situation of and problems in digital textbook instructional design. Tsing Hua Journal of Educational Research, 34(1), 71-104. doi:10.3966/252190062017063401003】
» 展開更多
中文APA引文格式陳茹玲、柯華葳、蔡佩眞(2020)。從教師認知、教學資源與教學實踐論國語文教育政策之困境與契機。教育科學研究期刊65(1),47-91。doi: 10.6209/JORIES.202003_65(1).0003
APA FormatChen, J.-L., Ko, H.-W. & Chou, C. (2020). Dilemmas and Opportunities in Mandarin Education Policy Implementation from the Perspectives of Teacher Acknowledgment, Resources, and Practice. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 65(1), 47-91. doi: 10.6209/JORIES.202003_65(1).0003

Journal directory listing - Volume 65(2020) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【65(1)】March

Dilemmas and Opportunities in Mandarin Education Policy Implementation from the Perspectives of Teacher Acknowledgment, Resources, and Practice Author: Ju-Ling Chen (Research Center for Indigenous Education, National Academy for Educational Research), Hwa-Wei Ko (Department of Education and Learning, National Tsing Hua University), Pei-Chen Tsai (Graduate School of Taiwanese Culture, National Taipei University of Education)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 65, No.1
Date:March 2020
Pages:47-91
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.202003_65(1).0003

Abstract:
    Structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 12 junior-high school Mandarin teachers to explore their opinions regarding three dimensions of Mandarin Education Policy —teacher acknowledgment, resources, and practices. The obtained data were first transcribed into verbal protocol, and classification and analysis were subsequently conducted according to a coding schema. Through discussion of the concepts and situation of Mandarin education, in-depth insight was obtained about the policy’s implementation. Based on the obtained insights, recommendations are proposed for the future Mandarin Education Policy.
    The study results revealed the following: First, teachers were most concerned about their professional development, demonstrating their strong abilities of reflection and evaluation, anticipation of professional growth, and goal of translating theory into practice. However, according to teachers, the in-service training provided by existing educational institutes is unsatisfactory, involves inadequate follow-up evaluations, and provides insufficient time for practice. These factors influence the policy’s effectiveness. Second, the concepts related to literacy presented in the Mandarin curricula were internalized within teachers’ schema, but high-level literacy concepts were rarely mentioned in their reports. Third, the distribution of hardware among schools was reported to be unequal and thus can be improved. Teachers reported that the curriculum textbooks are refined and diverse but fail to form a systematic framework. Finally, teachers claimed that teaching activities are diverse and oriented toward a learner-centered teaching method. However, differences in the abilities of students, assessments, expectations of parents influence their teaching.
Based on the above observations, suggestions are presented for framing future policies pertaining to Mandarin education: First, in-service training courses should be based on the professional knowledge and growth expectations of teachers. Moreover, a habit of implementing theory into practical scenarios should be cultivated. Second, teachers should be encouraged to be more creative and undertake courses more closely related to the high level objectives of the curricula. Third, the Mandarin literature expertise and teaching experience of teachers should be utilized to improve textbook selection and compiling. Thus, the texts could be more relevant, diverse, and appropriate for students’ experiences. Finally, the high-level literacy abilities that are aims of the curricula should be incorporated into teaching materials and assessment, and promoted among parents to gain more support.

Keywords:teacher acknowledgement, teaching resources, teaching practice, mandarin education policy, language curricula