師大學報 - 教育科學研究期刊 - 期刊目錄列表 - 65卷(2020) - 【教育科學研究期刊】65(2)六月刊（本期專題：臺灣師資培育制度的變革與再提升）

以作者名、篇名、關鍵字或DOI查詢

CONTRIBUTORS
NOTICE

[Guide for Submission]

稿約

[Style for Thesis Writing]

論文撰寫體例

[Review of Research Papers]

論文審查要點

[The Copyright]

著作權處理要點

[Flow of Review System]

審查制度流程

[Regulations Governing]

編審委員會設置要點

[Editorial Board]

本年度編審委員

[Advisory Board]

本年度諮詢委員

[Form Download]

相關表單下載

《教育科學研究期刊》「多元視角詮釋J. Bruner跨科際的教育科學研究之傳承」專題徵稿(截稿日至2025/06/30) 《教育科學研究期刊》「體驗與冒險教育」專題徵稿(截稿日至112/12/31) 賀《教育科學研究期刊》榮獲2019-2021年科技部臺灣人文及社會科學期刊評比收錄於第一級核心期刊!

期刊目錄列表 - 65卷(2020) - 【教育科學研究期刊】65(2)六月刊（本期專題：臺灣師資培育制度的變革與再提升）

回上一頁

（專題）師資職前教師專業素養與課程基準之建構及其運用作者:國立臺灣師範大學師資培育學院黃嘉莉、國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系暨教育心理與輔導學系暨學習科學跨國頂尖研究中心暨華語文與科技研究中心暨科技部人工智慧生技醫療創新研究中心陳學志、國立臺北教育大學課程與教學傳播科技研究所王俊斌、國立臺灣師範大學教育學系洪仁進

卷期：65卷第2期
日期：2020年6月
頁碼：1-35
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.202006_65(2).0001

摘要：
本研究旨在建構教師專業素養與課程基準，並探究其後續之運用，以作為兼顧大學自主發展師資培育課程及國家管制之機制。為達研究目的，本研究透過文獻分析、文件分析、專家焦點座談、關鍵詞擷取系統等方式，建構具有共識的教師專業素養與課程基準之內涵，並提供後續運用之建議，以配合2017 年《師資培育法》的修法。本研究結果建構五項教師專業素養及十項素養指標，以及課程基準的課程類型、學分架構、共同內容與課程條件等內涵。除此之外，本研究也提出師資培育機構後續運用之建議，包括發展師資培育理念以引領課程設計、模組化課程共同內容、系統性設計實踐課程、發展真實評量表現的方法與工具、整體性師資培育系統設計等。

關鍵詞：師資培育課程、師資職前階段、教師專業素養、課程基準

《詳全文》

參考文獻：

中華人民共和國教育部（2011）。教師教育課程標準（試行）。取自http://old.moe.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/s6049/201110/xxgk_125722.html 【Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2011). The standards for teacher education curriculum. Retrieved from http://old.moe.gov.cn//publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/s6049/201110/xxgk_125722.html】
王文科、王智弘（2010）。質的研究的信度和效度。彰化師大教育學報，17，29-50。doi:10.6769/JENCUE.201006.0029 【Wang, W.-K., & Wang, C.-H. (2010). Validity and reliability of qualitative research in education. Journal of Education National Changhua University of Education, 17, 29-50. doi:10.6769/JENCUE.201006.0029】
王秋絨（2011）。法國師資培育制度與教師素質。載於楊深坑、黃嘉莉（主編），各國師資培育制度與教師素質現況（pp. 121-140）。臺北市：教育部。【Wang, C.-R. (2011). The teacher education institution and teacher quality in French. In S.-K. Yang & J.-L. Huang (Eds.), Teacher education institutions and the status of teacher quality in different nations (pp. 121-140). Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of Education.】
王瑞壎（2008）。人口結構變遷下我國師資培育現況之分析。臺東大學教育學報，19（2），143-182。【Wang, R.-S. (2008). The analysis on teacher education in the change context of population structure in Taiwan. NTTU Educational Research Journal, 19(2), 143-182.】
王麗雲、徐銘璟（2015）。芬蘭師資培育制度特色及其對臺灣師資培育之啟示。教育實踐與研究，28（1），167-205。【Wang, L.-Y., & Hsu, M.-G. (2015). Features of Finnish teacher education system and its implications for teacher education in Taiwan. Journal of Educational Practice and Research, 28(1), 167-205.】

» 展開更多

中華人民共和國教育部（2011）。教師教育課程標準（試行）。取自http://old.moe.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/s6049/201110/xxgk_125722.html 【Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2011). The standards for teacher education curriculum. Retrieved from http://old.moe.gov.cn//publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/s6049/201110/xxgk_125722.html】
王文科、王智弘（2010）。質的研究的信度和效度。彰化師大教育學報，17，29-50。doi:10.6769/JENCUE.201006.0029 【Wang, W.-K., & Wang, C.-H. (2010). Validity and reliability of qualitative research in education. Journal of Education National Changhua University of Education, 17, 29-50. doi:10.6769/JENCUE.201006.0029】
王秋絨（2011）。法國師資培育制度與教師素質。載於楊深坑、黃嘉莉（主編），各國師資培育制度與教師素質現況（pp. 121-140）。臺北市：教育部。【Wang, C.-R. (2011). The teacher education institution and teacher quality in French. In S.-K. Yang & J.-L. Huang (Eds.), Teacher education institutions and the status of teacher quality in different nations (pp. 121-140). Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of Education.】
王瑞壎（2008）。人口結構變遷下我國師資培育現況之分析。臺東大學教育學報，19（2），143-182。【Wang, R.-S. (2008). The analysis on teacher education in the change context of population structure in Taiwan. NTTU Educational Research Journal, 19(2), 143-182.】
王麗雲、徐銘璟（2015）。芬蘭師資培育制度特色及其對臺灣師資培育之啟示。教育實踐與研究，28（1），167-205。【Wang, L.-Y., & Hsu, M.-G. (2015). Features of Finnish teacher education system and its implications for teacher education in Taiwan. Journal of Educational Practice and Research, 28(1), 167-205.】
丘愛鈴、水野治久（2017）。日本教育見習及教育實習課程之反思與展望。臺灣教育評論月刊，6（9），374-381。【Chiu, A.-L., & Haruhisa, M. (2017). Prospective and respective on Japanese education apprenticeships and educational internship course. Taiwan Education Review Monthly, 6(9), 374-381.】
立法院（2017a）。師資培育法修正草案法案評估。取自https://www.ly.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=6588&pid=85421 【Legislative Yuan. (2017a). Teacher education act amendment bill. Retrieved from https://www.ly.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=6588&pid=85421】
立法院（2017b）。立法院第9屆第3 會期教育及文化委員會第19次全體委員會紀錄。立法院公報，106（52），375-376。【Legislative Yuan. (2017b). Record of the 19th committee of the whole committee of the 9th session of the Legislative Yuan on education and culture. Legislative Yuan Bulletin, 106(52), 375-376.】
吳清山（2006）。師資培育理念與實踐。教育研究與發展期刊，2（1），1-31。【Wu, C.-S. (2006). The ideas and practice of teacher education. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 2(1), 1-31.】
吳清山（2018）。素養導向教師教育內涵建構及實踐之研究。教育科學研究期刊，63（4），261-293。doi:10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0009 【Wu, C.-S. (2018). Construction and practice of competency-based teacher education. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 63(4), 261-293. doi:10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0009】
李奉儒（2001）。英國教育改革：以中小學教育階段為例。載於李奉儒（主編），英國教育：政策與制度（pp. 11-29）。嘉義縣：濤石。【Lee, F.-J. (2001). Education reform of British: A case study on the primary and secondary education. In F.-J. Lee (Ed.), Education in England and Wales: Policies and institutions (pp. 11-29). Chiayi County, Taiwan: TaoShi.】
李奉儒（2008）。英國中小學教師素質管理制度之研究。載於楊深坑、王秋絨、李奉儒（主編），中小學教師素質管理制度比較研究（pp. 17-49）。臺北市：高等教育。【Lee, F.-J. (2008). A study of the quality management system for school teachers in England and Wales. In S.-K. Yang, C.-R. Wang, & F.-J. Lee (Eds.), Comparison of systems of teacher quality management (pp. 17-49). Taipei, Taiwan: Higher Education.】
李奉儒（2009）。師資培育。載於國家教育研究院（主編），中華民國教育年報98年（pp. 263-302）。新北市：編者。doi:10.6483/RCEY.201012.0263 【Lee, F.-J. (2009). Teacher education. In National Institute of Educational Resources and Research (Ed.), Education yearbook of Republic of China, 2009 (pp. 263-302). New Taipei City, Taiwan: Editor. doi:10.6483/RCEY.201012.0263】
李奉儒（2011a）。英國師資培育認證制度之探究。教育研究與發展期刊，1（1），53-81。【Lee, F.-J. (2011a). A study of teacher education/training accreditation system in England and Wales. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 1(1), 53-81.】
李奉儒（2011b）。英國師資培育制度與教師素質。載於楊深坑、黃嘉莉（主編），各國師資培育制度與教師素質現況（pp. 43-92）。臺北市：教育部。【Lee, F.-J. (2011b). The teacher education institution and teacher quality in England. In S.-K. Yang & J.-L. Huang (Eds.), Teacher education institutions and the status of teacher quality in different nations (pp. 43-92). Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of Education.】
李詠絮（2011）。芬蘭師資培育制度與教師素質。載於楊深坑、黃嘉莉（主編），各國師資培育制度與教師素質現況（pp. 141-176）。臺北市：教育部。【Lee, Y.-S. (2011). The teacher education institution and teacher quality in Finland. In S.-K. Yang & J.-L. Huang (Eds.), Teacher education institutions and the status of teacher quality in different nations (pp. 141-176). Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of Education.】
沈翠蓮（2004）。臺灣小學師資培育史。臺北市：五南。【Shen, C.-L. (2004). History of elementary school teacher education in Taiwan. Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan.】
周愚文（2014）。教育史學研究。臺北市：國立臺灣師範大學出版中心。【Chou, Y.-W. (2014). Educational historiography research. Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan Normal University Press.】
周愚文（2016）。我國教師地位與教師專業標準的建立。載於吳清基、黃嘉莉（主編），教師專業標準、發展與實踐（pp. 1-22）。臺北市：中華民國師範教育學會。【Chou, Y.-W. (2016). Teacher status and the establishment of teacher professional standards in Taiwan. In C.-J. Wu & J.-L. Huang (Eds.), The development and practice of teacher professional standards (pp. 1-22). Taipei, Taiwan: Teacher Education Society of R.O.C..】
林新發、王秀玲、鄧珮秀（2007）。我國中小學師資培育現況、政策與展望。教育研究與發展期刊，3（1），57-79。【Lin, H.-F., Wang, H.-L., & Teng, P.-H. (2007). The current situation, policy and prospect of elementary and secondary teacher education in Taiwan. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 3(1), 57-79.】
張芬芬（2012）。文本分析方法論及其對教科書分析研究的啟示。載於國家教育研究院（主編），開卷有益：教科書的回顧與前瞻（pp. 161-197）。臺北市：高等教育。【Chang, F.-F. (2012). Text analysis methodology and its implications for textbook analysis research. In National Academy for Educational Research (Ed.), The opening of the book is useful: Respect and prospect of textbooks (pp. 161-197). Taipei, Taiwan: Higher Education.】
教育部（1934）。師範學校課程標準。南京市：作者。【Ministry of Education. (1934). The curriculum standards for normal school. Nanjing, China: Author.】
教育部（1944）。師範學校課程標準。取自http://taiwanebook.ncl.edu.tw/zh-tw/book/NTL-9900014278/reader 【Ministry of Education. (1944). The curriculum standards for normal school. Retrieved from http://taiwanebook.ncl.edu.tw/zh-tw/book/NTL-9900014278/reader】
教育部（2012a）。我國師資培育數量第二階段規劃方案。取自http://web.nutn.edu.tw/gac201/best/101-11-30%E5%B8%AB%E5%9F%B9%E7%AC%AC2%E9%9A%8E%E6%AE%B5%E8%A6%8F%E5%8A%83%E6%96%B9%E6%A1%88.pdf 【Ministry of Education. (2012a). The second stage plan for the number of teacher education in Taiwan. Retrieved from http://web.nutn.edu.tw/gac201/best/101-11-30%E5%B8%AB%E5%9F%B9%E7%AC%AC2%E9%9A%8E%E6%AE%B5%E8%A6%8F%E5%8A%83%E6%96%B9%E6%A1%88.pdf】
教育部（2012b）。中華民國師資培育白皮書。臺北市：作者。【Ministry of Education. (2012b). White book of teacher education in R.O.C.. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
教育部（2015）。十二年國民基本教育領域課程綱要核心素養發展手冊。取自https://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/23/relfile/8006/51358/9df0910c-56e0-433a-8f80-05a50efeca72.pdf 【Ministry of Education. (2015). The manual for 12-year basic education curriculum outline core literacy development. Retrieved from https://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/23/relfile/8006/51358/9df0910c-56e0-433a-8f80-05a50efeca72.pdf】
教育部（2017）。師資培育法修正草案總說明。臺北市：作者。【Ministry of Education. (2017). General description of the revised draft of the Teacher Education Act. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
梁忠銘（2011）。日本師資培育制度與教師素質。載於楊深坑、黃嘉莉（主編），各國師資培育制度與教師素質現況（pp. 243-276）。臺北市：教育部。【Liang, C.-M. (2011). The teacher education institution and teacher quality in Japan. In S.-K. Yang & J.-L. Huang (Eds.), Teacher education institutions and the status of teacher quality in different nations (pp. 243-276). Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of Education.】
符碧真（2018）。素養導向國教新課綱的師資培育：國立臺灣大學「探究式─素養導向的師資培育」理想芻議。教育科學研究期刊，63（4），59-87。doi:10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0003 【Fwu, B.-J. (2018). Teacher preparation in response to competence-based curriculum reform for K-12 education: National Taiwan University’s proposal of inquiry-based and competence-based teacher education. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 63(4), 59-87. doi:10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0003】
陳世榮（2015）。社會科學研究中的文字探勘應用：以文意為基礎的文件分類及其問題。人文及社會科學集刊，27（4），683-718。【Chen, S.-R. (2015). Text mining for social studies: Meaning-based document classification and its problems. Journal of Social Science and Philosophy, 27(4), 683-718.】
陳美玉（2006）。教師個人知識管理在專業發展上應用之研究。課程與教學季刊，9（1），99-121。doi:10.6384/CIQ.200601.0099 【Chen, M.-Y. (2006). The application of the teacher’s personal knowledge management on the professional development. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 9(1), 99-121. doi:10.6384/CIQ.200601.0099】
游美惠（2000）。內容分析、文本分析與論述分析在社會研究的運用。調查研究：方法與應用，8，5-42。doi:10.7014/TCYC.200008.0005 【You, M.-H. (2000). Content analysis, textual analysis and discourse analysis in social research. Survey Research: Method and Application, 8, 5-42. doi:10.7014/TCYC.200008.0005】
黃源河、符碧真（2009）。一樣軌跡兩樣情：美國與我國師資培育機構轉型與教師質量之比較。教育科學研究期刊，54（4），171-200。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(2).03 【Hwang, Y.-H., & Fwu, B.-J. (2009). Similar routes but different paths: Teacher preparation, teacher quantity and quality in the U.S. and Taiwan. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 54(4), 171-200. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(2).03】
黃嘉莉（2009）。超額教師現象對師資培育之啟示。中等教育，60（3），32-46。doi:10.6249/SE.2009.60.3.03 【Huang, J.-L. (2009). The issues of teacher education on surplus teachers. Secondary Education, 60(3), 32-46. doi:10.6249/SE.2009.60.3.03】
黃嘉莉（2013）。標準本位師資培育理念與實踐。臺北市：國立臺灣師範大學出版中心。【Huang, J.-L. (2013). The idea and practice of standards-based teacher education. Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan Normal University Press.】
黃嘉莉（2015）。臺灣師資培育制度市場化與專業化之回顧與省思。載於吳清基、黃嘉莉（主編），《師資培育法》20 年來的回顧與前瞻（pp. 103-140）。臺北市：中華民國師範教育學會。【Huang, J.-L. (2015). The retrospective and reflection on the marketization and professionalization of teacher education system in Taiwan. In C.-J. Wu & J.-L. Huang (Eds.), Teacher education act: Developments over the last twenty years past and future (pp. 103-140). Taipei, Taiwan: Teacher Education Society of R.O.C..】
黃嘉莉（2016）。中小學教師證照制度的社會學分析：社會藩籬論觀點。臺灣教育社會學研究，16（2），65-103。doi:10.3966/168020042016121602003 【Huang, J.-L. (2016). Sociological analysis on teacher credential for middle and elementary school teachers: A social closure perspective. Taiwan Journal of Sociology of Education, 16(2), 65-103. doi:10.3966/168020042016121602003】
黃嘉莉（2017）。中小學教師核心能力國際趨勢之研究：兩層五力之建構。載於中華民國比較教育學會（主編），比較教育200 週年紀念專書（pp. 107-147）。臺北市：學富。【Huang, J.-L. (2017). A trend international analysis on school teacher core competence: The construction of two dimensions and five core competencies. In Chinese Taipei Comparative Education Society (Ed.), Commemorative book of 200th anniversary of comparative education (pp. 107-147). Taipei, Taiwan: Pro-Ed.】
黃嘉莉（2019）。師資養成公費制度之歷史探究。教育科學研究期刊，64（2），99-129。doi:10.6209/JORIES.201906_64(2).0004 【Huang, J.-L. (2019). A historical approach on the government-funded system for teacher preparation. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 64(2), 99-129. doi:10.6209/JORIES.201906_64(2).0004】
楊深坑、黃嘉莉（主編）（2011）。各國師資培育制度與教師素質之現況。臺北市：教育部。【Yang, S.-K., & Huang, J.-L. (Eds.). (2011). Teacher education institutions and the status of teacher quality in different nations. Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of Education.】
楊銀興、林政逸、劉健慧（2007）。我國多元化師資培育政策問題影響評估。教育理論與實踐學刊，16，1-21。doi:10.7038/JETP.200712.0002 【Yang, Y.-H., Lin, J.-Y., & Liu, C.-H. (2007). The impact evaluation of our nation’s diverse teacher education policy. Bulletin of Research on Elementary Education, 16, 1-21. doi:10.7038/JETP.200712.0002】
楊瑩（1996）。一九八八年後的英國教育改革。載於黃政傑（主編），各國教育改革動向（pp.107-134）。臺北市：師大書苑。【Yang, Y. (1966). Educational reform in England since 1988. In J.-J. Huang (Ed.), Trends in education reform in different countries (pp. 107-134). Taipei, Taiwan: Lucky Bookstore.】
葉至誠、葉立誠（2002）。研究方法與論文寫作。臺北市：商鼎文化。【Yeh, C.-C., & Yeh, L.-C. (2002). Research methods and thesis writing. Taipei, Taiwan: Shinning Culture.】
潘慧玲（2003）。社會科學研究典範的流變。教育研究資訊，11（1），115-143。【Pan, H.-L. W. (2003). The evolution of social research paradigms. Educational Research & Information, 11(1), 115-143.】
謝斐敦（2011）。德國師資培育制度與教師素質。載於楊深坑、黃嘉莉（主編），各國師資培育制度與教師素質之現況（pp. 353-401）。臺北市：教育部。【Hsieh, F.-D. (2011). The teacher education institution and teacher quality in Germany. In S.-K. Yang & J.-L. Huang (Eds.), Teacher education institutions and the status of teacher quality in different nations (pp. 353-401). Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of Education.】
瞿立鶴（1979）。近三十年來我國中等學校師資之培養與進修。教育資料集刊，4，77-116。【Chu, L.-H. (1979). Training of middle-school teachers in Taiwan and their continued education over the past thirty years. Bulletin of Educational Resources and Research, 4, 77-116.】
顏佩如、歐于菁、王蘊涵（2012）。芬蘭中小學師資培育碩士化制度與最新師資培育政策發展之研究。臺中教育大學學報：教育類，26（1），31-54。【Yen, P.-R., Ou, Y.-C., & Wang, Y.-H. (2012). A study on the master degree system and the latest educational policy development of the Finnish primary and secondary school teacher education. Journal of National Taichung University: Education, 26(1), 31-54.】
蘇永明（2000）。迎接新世紀的教育挑戰—以英國教師綠皮書之因應策略為例。載於中華民國比較教育學會（主編），新世紀的教育挑戰與各國因應策略（pp. 185-208）。臺北市：揚智。【Su, Y.-M. (2000). Meeting the educational challenges of the new century: A case study on the response strategy of the British Teacher Green Book. In Chinese Taipei Comparative Education Society (Ed.), The new era education: Challenges and responses (pp. 185-208). Taipei, Taiwan: Yang-Chih.】
顧明遠（主編）（2015）。歷代教育制度考。湖北省：湖北教育。【Gu, M.-Y. (Ed.). (2015). Examination of the educational system of the past dynasties. Hubei, China: Hubei Education.】
Alexander, R. J. (1984). Innovation and continuity in the initial teacher curriculum. In R. J. Alexander, M. Craft, & J. Lynch (Eds.), Change in teacher education: Context and provision since Robbins (pp. 103-160). London, UK: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Ben-Peretz, M. (2011). Teacher knowledge: What is it? How do we uncover it? What are its implications for school? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 3-9. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.07.015
Carter, C. (1990). Teacher’s knowledge and learning to teach. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on learning to teach (pp. 291-310). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Chang, Y.-H., Chang, C.-Y., & Tseng, Y.-H. (2010). Trends of science education research: An automatic content analysis. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(4), 315-331. doi:10.1007/s10956-009-9202-2
Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947-967. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7
Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1988). Teachers as curriculum planners: Narrative of experience. New York, NY: Teacher College Press.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1990). Teacher professionalism: Why and how? In A. Lieberman (Ed.), Schools as collaborative cultures: Creating the future now (pp. 25-50). Philadelphia, PA:Falmer.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300-314. doi:10.1177/0022487105285962
Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 523-545. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00015-9
Elbaz, F. (1983). Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge. New York, NY: Nichols Publishing. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London, UK: Longman.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (1989). Teacher preparation: Structural and conceptual alternatives. Issue paper 89-5. Washington, DC: National Center for Research on Teacher Education.
Feiman-Nemser, S., & Remillard, J. (1995). Perspectives on learning to teach. East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Learning, Michigan State University.
Grossman, P. L., & Richert, A. E. (1988). Unacknowledged knowledge growth: A re-examination of the effects of teacher education. Teaching & Teacher Education, 4(1), 53-62. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(88)90024-8
Grossman, P., & Thompson, C. (2008). Learning from curriculum materials: Scaffolds for new teachers? Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8), 2014-2026. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2008.05.002
Guerrero, D., & De los Rios, D. (2012). Professional competences: A classification of international models. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science, 46, 1290-1296. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.290
Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession:What would it look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3-15. doi:10.3102/0013189X031005003
Hoban, G. F. (2004). Seeking quality in teacher education design: A four-dimensional approach. Australian Journal of Education, 48(2), 117-133. doi:10.1177/000494410404800203
Hollins, E. R. (2011). Teacher preparation for quality teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(4), 395-407. doi:10.1177/0022487111409415
Huang, J.-L. (2015). Cultivating teacher thinking: Ideas and practice. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 14(3), 247-257. doi:10.1007/s10671-015-9184-1
Kansanen, P. (2003). Teacher education in Finland: Current models and new developments. In M. Moon, L. Vlãsceanu, & C. Barrows (Eds.), Institutional approaches to teacher education within higher education in Europe: Current models and new developments (pp. 85-108). Bucharest, Romania: UNESCO-CEPES.
Kennedy, M. M. (1991). Some surprising findings on how teachers learn to teach. Educational Leadership, 49(3), 14-17.
Kennedy, M. M. (2006). Knowledge and vision in teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 205-211. doi:10.1177/0022487105285639
Korthagen, F. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(1), 77-97. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2003.10.002
Korthagen, F. (2010). Situated learning theory and the pedagogy of teacher education: Towards an integrative view of teacher behavior and teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(1), 98-106. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.05.001
Lanier, J. E., & Little, J. W. (1986). Research on teacher education. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 527-569). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Linn, R. L., & Gronlund, N. E. (2000). Measurement and assessment in teaching (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Malinen, O. P., Väisänen, P., & Savolainen, H. (2012). Teacher education in Finland: A review of a national effort for preparing teachers for the future. The Curriculum Journal, 23(4), 567-584. doi:10.1080/09585176.2012.731011
Ministère de l’Éducation nationale. (2013). Référentiel des compétences professionnelles des métiers du professorat et de l’éducation. Retrieved from http://www.education.gouv.fr/pid25535/bulletin_officiel.html?cid_bo=73066
Munby, H., Russell, T., & Martin, A. (2001). Teachers’ knowledge and how it develops. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 877-904). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
National Commission on Teaching & America’s Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America’s future. New York, NY: Author.
Niemi, H., & Jakku-Sihvonen, R. (2011). Teacher education in Finland. In M. V. Zuljan & J. Vogrine (Eds.), European dimension of teacher education: Similarities and differences (pp. 33-52). Ljubljana, Slovenia: University of Ljubljana.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2011). Building a high-quality teaching profession: Lessons from around the world (Background report for the international summit on the teaching profession). Paris, France: Author.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Požarnik, B. M. (2011). Teacher education in Europe between unity and diversity. In M. V. Zuljan & J. Vogrine (Eds.), European dimension of teacher education: Similarities and differences (pp.33-52). Ljubljana, Slovenia: University of Ljubljana.
Scannell, D. P. (2002). Models of teacher education. Report to the American Council on Education. Retrieved from https://docuri.com/download/models-of-teacher-education_59c1dc83f581710b2868ae90_pdf
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23. doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Shulman, L. S. (1988). A union of insufficiencies: Strategies for teacher assessment in a period of education reform. Educational Leadership, 46(3), 36-41.
Shulman, L. S. (2004). The wisdom of practice: Managing complexity in medicine and teaching. In S. M. Wilson (Ed.), The wisdom of practice: Essays on teaching, learning, and learning to teach (pp. 251-271). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Sykes, G., & Plastrik, P. (1993). Standard setting as educational reform: Trends and issues paper No.8. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teacher Education and American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
Tamir, P. (1991). Professional and personal knowledge of teachers and teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(3), 263-268. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(91)90033-L
Tang, Y. F. S. (2003). Challenge and support: The dynamics of student teachers’ professional learning in the field experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(5), 483-498. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(03)00047-7
Tellez, K. (1996). Authentic assessment. In J. Silula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 704-721). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Tseng, Y.-H., Chang, C.-Y., Chang Rundgren, S.-N., & Rundgren, C.-J. (2010). Mining concept maps from news stories for measuring civic scientific literacy in media. Computers and Education, 55(1), 165-177. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.01.002
Valli, L., & Rennert-Ariev, P. (2002). New standards and assessments? Curriculum transformation in teacher education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(2), 201-225. doi:10.1080/00220270110093625
Van Manen, M. (1991). The tact of teaching: The meaning of pedagogical thoughtfulness. New York, NY: Suny Press.
Weinert, F. E. (2001). Competencies and key competencies: Educational perspective. In N. J.
Semlser & P. B. Balties (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral science (pp. 2433-2436). Amsterdam, Netherland: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/02384-6
Whitty, G., Power, S., & Halpin, D. (1998). Devolution & choice in education: The school, the state and the market. Melbourne, Australia: The Australian Council for Educational Research.
Wise, A. E. (1996). Building a system of quality assurance for the teaching profession: Moving into the 21st century. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(3), 190-192.
Zeichner, K. M. (2003). The adequacies and inadequacies of three current strategies to recruit, prepare, and retain the best teachers for all students. Teachers College Record, 105(3), 490-519.doi:10.1111/1467-9620.00248

中文APA引文格式	黃嘉莉、陳學志、王俊斌、洪仁進（2020）。師資職前教師專業素養與課程基準之建構及其運用。教育科學研究期刊，65（2），1-35。 doi:10.6209/JORIES.202006_65(2).0001
APA Format	Huang, J.-L., Chen, H.-C., Wang, C.-P., & Hung, J.-C. (2020). Construction and Application of Teacher Professional Standards and Curriculum Baseline for Preservice Teacher Education. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 65(2), 1-35. doi:10.6209/JORIES.202006_65(2).0001

Journal directory listing - Volume 65 (2020) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【65(2)】June (Special Issue: The Innovation and Enhancement of Teacher Professional Development in Taiwan)

Top

(Special Issue) Construction and Application of Teacher Professional Standards and Curriculum Baseline for Preservice Teacher Education Author: Jia-Li Huang (College of Teacher Education, National Taiwan Normal University), Hsueh-Chih Chen (Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling, Institute for Research Excellence in Learning Sciences, Chinese Language and Technology Center,National Taiwan Normal University, MOST Artificial Intelligence Biomedical Research Center), Chun-Ping Wang (Graduate School of Curriculum and Instructional Communications Technology, National Taipei University of Education), Jen-Chin Hung (Department of Education, National Taiwan Normal University)

Vol.&No.：Vol. 65, No.2
Date：June 2020
Pages：1-35
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.202006_65(2).0001

Abstract：
Based on the amendment of the Teacher Education Act 2017, this study determined professional standards for teachers and a curriculum baseline for preservice teacher education. Additionally, it provides the principles for designing teacher education curriculum through literature and document analysis, focus meetings, and keyword extraction. This study proposed 5 professional standards for teachers and 10 indicators and curriculum baselines with categories, credits framework, core curriculum, and conditions. Moreover, suggestions were presented for designing teacher education curriculum, such as utilizing the concept of teacher education to direct the following: curriculum designing, correspondence of the core curriculum toward modularization, practice designs from the perspective of teaching students’ learning, assessment methods and tools to evaluate teaching students’ performance, and systemic design of teacher education curriculum.

Keywords：teacher education curriculum, preservice teacher education, teacher professional standards, curriculum baseline

本網站獲「科技部人文社會科學研究中心」補助

地址：臺北市大安區和平東路一段162號國立臺灣師範大學圖書館出版中心

電話：(02)7749-5279

CONTRIBUTORSNOTICE

期刊目錄列表 - 65卷(2020) - 【教育科學研究期刊】65(2)六月刊（本期專題：臺灣師資培育制度的變革與再提升） 回上一頁

Journal directory listing - Volume 65 (2020) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【65(2)】June (Special Issue: The Innovation and Enhancement of Teacher Professional Development in Taiwan) Top

CONTRIBUTORS
NOTICE

期刊目錄列表 - 65卷(2020) - 【教育科學研究期刊】65(2)六月刊（本期專題：臺灣師資培育制度的變革與再提升）

回上一頁

Journal directory listing - Volume 65 (2020) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【65(2)】June (Special Issue: The Innovation and Enhancement of Teacher Professional Development in Taiwan)

Top