期刊目錄列表 - 65卷(2020) - 【教育科學研究期刊】65(4)十二月刊(本期專題:高等教育專業發展與教育創新:回顧與前瞻)

(專題)國內大學學習預警資訊系統研究:發展現況與侷限 作者:國立臺灣大學教學發展中心謝佩珊、國立臺灣大學教學發展中心石美倫

卷期:65卷第4期
日期:2020年12月
頁碼:171-201
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.202012_65(4).0006

摘要:
學生學習預警資訊系統被認為是評量學生學習成效、預測學習困擾、輔導高危險群學生的有力機制,尤其近年來新興資訊技術的進步,使學習預警資訊系統在規模和作法上都有所突破。國內各大學發展學習預警資訊系統已超過10年,普及率也相當高,但是相較於國外既有的深入性和檢討性研究,目前針對國內現有學習預警機制與系統運作的著述仍然頗為零散,而該系統在功能上的敏感性及資料上的隱密性,也讓各校之間缺乏相關資訊交流。因此,本研究主要透過文獻探討、訪察和訪談等方法,針對國內目前56所公私立一般大學學習預警資訊系統的現行運作情況進行概括性調查。研究發現,目前各校多已建立了學期間、即時和特殊預警等不同機制,系統使用率在許多大學也都達到半數課程以上,但在實際使用上常面臨教師反彈和後續追蹤不易等問題。建議未來各校應以加強跨單位合作、提升系統使用成效評估,以及提供更多元的預警指標為方向,進一步落實學習預警資訊系統之功能及使用效益。

關鍵詞:高危險群學生、學習預警、學習預警資訊系統、學習輔導

《詳全文》 檔名

參考文獻:
  1. 王瑋婷、黃國倫(2016)。學生課程出席率對學習成效之影響─以國立臺北藝術大學為例。載於國立東華大學主辦之TANET2016臺灣網際網路研討會」論文集(pp. 1129-1133),花蓮縣。doi:10.6679/TANET.2016.201【Wang, W.-T., & Huang, G.-L. (2016). The impact of student’s attendance on learning outcomes: A case study at Taipei National University of the Arts. In National Dong Hwa University (Ed.), Proceeding of 2016 Taiwan Academic NETwork Conference (TANET2016) (pp. 1129-1133), Hualien, Taiwan. doi:10.6679/TANET.2016.201】
  2. 余奕憲(2018)。學習預警機制之探討與預測模型之建立(未出版碩士論文)。國立中央大學,桃園市。【Yu, Y.-H. (2018). Exploration of the early warning system and establishment of a forecast model (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Central University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.】
  3. 周汎澔、歐秀慧、林志隆、鐘育志、陳鵬元、楊瑞成(2010)。醫學大學學生期中成績預警與課業輔導之實施成效。醫學教育,14(3),197-208。doi:10.6145/jme.201009_14(3).0004【Chou, F.-H., Ou, H.-H., Lin, C.-L., Jong, Y.-J., Chen, P.-Y., & Yang, R.-C. (2010). Effectiveness of midterm early warning and tutoring in students at a medical university. Journal of Medical Education, 14(3), 197-208. doi:10.6145/jme.201009_14(3).0004】
  4. 邱宏彬、許依宸(2011)。資料採礦在學生流失偵測上之應用。資訊管理研究,11,83-99。【Chiu, H.-P., & Hsu Y.-C. (2011). Application of data mining techniques for detection of student drop out. Journal of Information Management, 11, 83-99.】
  5. 唐慧慈、郭玟杏(2017)。臺灣經驗:校務研究及對大學校院發展之影響。評鑑雙月刊,65,24-26。【Tang, H.-C., & Guo, W.-X. (2017). Taiwan experience: Institutional research and the impact on higher education. Evaluation Bimonthly, 65, 24-26.】
» 展開更多
中文APA引文格式謝佩珊、石美倫(2020)。國內大學學習預警資訊系統研究:發展現況與侷限。教育科學研究期刊,65(4),171-201。doi:10.6209/JORIES.202012_65(4).0006
APA FormatHsieh, P.-S., & Shih, M. (2020). Students’ early alert systems in taiwanese universities: A study of current uses and restrictions. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 65(4), 171-201. doi:10.6209/JORIES.202012_65(4).0006

Journal directory listing - Volume 65(2020) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【65(4)】December (Special Issue: Professional Development and Educational Innovation in Higher Education: Retrospect and Prospect)

(Special Issue) Students’ Early Alert Systems in Taiwanese Universities: A Study of Current Uses and Restrictions Author: Pei-Shan Hsieh (Center for Teaching and Learning Development, National Taiwan University), Meilun Shih (Centerfor Teachingand Learning Development, National Taiwan University)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 65, No. 4
Date:December 2020
Pages:171-201
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.202012_65(4).0006

Abstract:
The development of students’ early alert systems (EAS), or students’ learning alarm systems, has long been discussed by administrators and researchers in higher education. They are considered a powerful mechanism for evaluating students’ learning effectiveness, predicting potential learning difficulties, and identifying academically at-risk students. The rapid growth of information technology has made the EAS advanced in scale and practice. However, although most universities in Taiwan have established similar preventive systems or mechanisms, few studies have focused on exploring actual uses of and possible restrictions on existing EAS. Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to outline the current situation of EAS in Taiwanese universities. We explored the following questions: (1) What types of EAS have been established in universities in Taiwan? (2) What are the main functions and mechanisms of the current EAS? (3) What are the actual uses of EAS in universities? (4) What are the possible restrictions on and solutions for using EAS? Data were gathered from 56 public and private universities in Taiwan. Experts familiar with or in charge of EAS design, development, and use in these universities were interviewed by telephone or face-to-face. We found that although the utility rate of EAS in most universities tended to be high, faculty resistance and difficulty in follow-up assessments on EAS utilization were the two common restrictions that occurred across campuses. To enhance the use effectiveness of EAS, faculty and administrators from both departmental and institutional levels should be involved. In addition, this study suggested that in the future, universities must attempt to strengthen collaboration among units related to EAS, improve the evaluation of EAS effectiveness, and provide additional early alert indicators of students’ academic performance.

Keywords:at-risk student group, academic alert, early alert system, intervention