(Special Issue) The Impact of Social and Emotional Learning Interventions on Learning Motivation, Academic Achievement, Anxiety, Misbehavior, and Well-being
Author: Hsiu-Ling Lin (Science Education Center, National Taiwan Normal University), Hsueh-Chih Chen (Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling, National Taiwan Normal University), Meng-Hua Tsai (Center for Teaching and Learning Resources, Chang Gung University)
Vol.&No.:Vol. 70, No. 3
Date:September 2025
Pages:167-214
DOI:https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202509_70(3).0006
Abstract:
Introduction
Contemporary society, marked by rapid changes and events such as the COVID-19 pandemic, presents significant emotional challenges to the younger generation. Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) is proposed as a systematic educational approach designed to cultivate essential skills, including self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, relationship skills, and responsible decision-making. While SEL programs have been widely implemented, a notable gap exists in the understanding of their indirect effects, specifically concerning how these programs influence psychological well-being and academic achievement through the development of core competencies.
This paper underscores the urgency of promoting SEL in Taiwan, citing statistics that reveal substantial mental health challenges among students, encompassing issues like cyberbullying, depression, and suicidal ideation. Although certain local initiatives have been introduced, a more rigorous evaluation of SEL program effectiveness is needed, particularly regarding the indirect effects. Consequently, this study aims to address this gap by examining both the direct and indirect impacts of a systematic SEL program.
Literature Review
The literature review establishes SEL as a critical educational paradigm that extends beyond traditional academic instruction, emphasizing students’ emotional and social development. It highlights research demonstrating SEL’s positive effects on various student outcomes, including academic achievement, social skills, psychological well-being, and a reduction in anxiety, behavioral problems, and bullying. Furthermore, the review acknowledges the global recognition of SEL, evidenced by its integration into the educational frameworks of organizations like UNESCO and countries such as the UK and Singapore.
The paper details the fundamental principles that guide effective SEL program design, encapsulated by the SAFE acronym: Sequenced, Active, Focused, and Explicit. It also presents a model for SEL implementation within school settings, emphasizing the complex interplay of factors like teacher competence, school environment, and community context. Additionally, it discusses the increasing recognition of the importance of incorporating mindfulness practices, repeated practice, and experiential learning into SEL programs.
The review further examines the relationship between SEL and key educational outcomes:
‧ Social and Emotional Learning and Learning Motivation: The paper discusses how SEL aligns with motivational theories, including attribution theory, expectancy-value theory, and self-determination theory. It explains how SEL can cultivate a growth mindset, enhance self-regulation, and promote intrinsic motivation.
‧ Social and Emotional Learning and Well-being: The paper connects SEL to theories of well-being, such as need satisfaction theory, trait theory, and the PERMA model. It posits that SEL develops skills that contribute to positive emotions, engagement, relationships, meaning, and accomplishment, thereby enhancing students’ overall well-being.
‧ Social and Emotional Learning and Socioemotional Problem Behavior: The review explores how SEL can mitigate both internalizing problems (e.g., anxiety, depression) and externalizing problems (e.g., aggression, rule-breaking behavior). It emphasizes the role of SEL in fostering emotional regulation, self-control, and positive social interactions.
In summary, the literature review establishes SEL as an essential intervention for promoting students’ holistic development across academic, emotional, social, and behavioral dimensions.
Research Methods
This study employed a quasi-experimental design, utilizing pre- and post-tests, to evaluate the effectiveness of a systematic SEL program implemented with elementary school students. The participants comprised 220 fifth and sixth-grade students from an elementary school located in Northern Taiwan. These students were divided into an experimental group, which received the SEL intervention, and a control group, which continued with their standard curriculum. The SEL program was conducted over a period of ten weeks and focused on the development of five core competencies: self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, relationship skills, and responsible decision-making.
To ensure greater comparability between the experimental and control groups, the study controlled for the variables of grade level and gender. A range of standardized scales was employed to measure key constructs, including social-emotional learning, learning motivation, anxiety levels, behavioral issues, and subjective well-being. Academic achievement was evaluated using standardized scores obtained from tests in language arts, mathematics, social studies, and science.
Data analysis involved the use of Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) to compare the post-intervention outcomes of the experimental and control groups, with pre-test scores being used as covariates in these analyses. Furthermore, parallel mediation path analysis was conducted to investigate the indirect effects of SEL on the outcome variables. The study also incorporated qualitative data, gathered through teacher interviews and classroom observations, to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the SEL program’s impact.
Results and Discussion
The quantitative results of the study revealed several significant findings:
‧ Enhanced Social-Emotional Learning: The SEL program led to significant improvements in students’ overall social-emotional competence, particularly in the areas of self-awareness, relationship skills, and responsible decision-making.
‧ Improved Learning Motivation and Academic Achievement: SEL instruction was found to have a positive influence on students’ learning motivation and academic performance.
‧ Reduced Anxiety and Misbehavior: The implementation of the SEL program was effective in reducing students’ anxiety levels and the occurrence of misbehavior.
‧ Increased Subjective Well-being: Students in the experimental group reported higher levels of subjective well-being following their participation in the SEL intervention.
The mediation analysis further demonstrated that self-awareness and social skills played a crucial role in mediating the effects of the SEL program on students’ academic achievement, learning motivation, and overall well-being.
Qualitative data, derived from teacher observations and interviews, provided support for these quantitative findings. Teachers reported observing positive changes in students’ emotional regulation abilities, conflict resolution skills, and general classroom behavior.
Conclusions and Recommendations
This study concludes that SEL programs can be effective tools for promoting students’ positive development across a range of important domains. The findings underscore the significance of self-awareness and social skills as key mechanisms through which SEL influences students’ learning motivation, academic achievement, and subjective well-being.
Based on the study’s results, the authors offer the following recommendations:
‧ Strengthening Self-Management and Social Awareness Instruction: It is recommended that future SEL programs include more explicit and intensive training focused on the development of self-management and social awareness skills.
‧ Increasing Practice Opportunities and Support: The authors emphasize the importance of providing students with ample opportunities to practice SEL skills in diverse contexts, coupled with the creation of a supportive learning environment, to facilitate the internalization of these skills.
‧ Integrating Local Values and Cultural Context: The study suggests that incorporating local cultural values and contexts into SEL curricula can enhance their relevance and effectiveness for students.
The authors also acknowledge certain limitations of the study, such as its relatively short-term duration and limited sample size. They propose directions for future research, including the use of longitudinal study designs and investigations with larger and more diverse samples.
Keywords:well-being, socioemotional problem behavior, social and emotional learning, SEL programs, learning motivation
《Full Text》
References:王為國(2016)。美國SEL教育方案對綜合活動學習領域之啟示。臺灣教育評論月刊,5(8),72-79。
【Wang, W.-K. (2016). Implications of American SEL programs for the integrated activity learning area. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 5(8), 72-79.】
吳相儀、陳榕婕、廖思涵(2019)。青少年幸福感量表之編製與信效度驗證(研討會論文)。臺灣應用心理學會與臺灣生理與神經回饋學會聯合年會,高雄市。
【Wu, H.-Y., Chen, R.-J., & Liao, S.-H. (2019). Compilation of the adolescent happiness scale [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of Taiwan Society of Applied Psychology & Taiwan Society of Physiology and Neurological Feedback, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.】
林秀玲、陳學志、蔡孟寧(付梓中)。「學童社會情緒學習量表」之編製與驗證。測驗學刊。
【Lin, H.-L., Chen, H.-C., & Tsai, M.-N. (in press). The development and validation of children’s social-emotional learning scale. Psychological Testing.】
林育陞(2020)。國小學童正向情緒培養的課程建構之探討─正向心理學觀點。諮商與輔導,415,9-13。
【Lin, Y.-S. (2020). Constructing positive emotion development curriculum for elementary school students: A positive psychology perspective. Counseling and Guidance, 415, 9-13.】
兒福聯盟(2020)。臺灣民眾被家長體罰經驗與認知調查報告。https://www.children.org.tw/ publication_research/research_report/446
【Child Welfare League Foundation, R.O.C. (2020). A survey report on Taiwanese people’s experience and perception of corporal punishment by parents. https://www.children.org.tw/publication_research/ research_report/446】
» More
一、中文文獻
王為國(2016)。美國SEL教育方案對綜合活動學習領域之啟示。臺灣教育評論月刊,5(8),72-79。
【Wang, W.-K. (2016). Implications of American SEL programs for the integrated activity learning area. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 5(8), 72-79.】
吳相儀、陳榕婕、廖思涵(2019)。青少年幸福感量表之編製與信效度驗證(研討會論文)。臺灣應用心理學會與臺灣生理與神經回饋學會聯合年會,高雄市。
【Wu, H.-Y., Chen, R.-J., & Liao, S.-H. (2019). Compilation of the adolescent happiness scale [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of Taiwan Society of Applied Psychology & Taiwan Society of Physiology and Neurological Feedback, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.】
林秀玲、陳學志、蔡孟寧(付梓中)。「學童社會情緒學習量表」之編製與驗證。測驗學刊。
【Lin, H.-L., Chen, H.-C., & Tsai, M.-N. (in press). The development and validation of children’s social-emotional learning scale. Psychological Testing.】
林育陞(2020)。國小學童正向情緒培養的課程建構之探討─正向心理學觀點。諮商與輔導,415,9-13。
【Lin, Y.-S. (2020). Constructing positive emotion development curriculum for elementary school students: A positive psychology perspective. Counseling and Guidance, 415, 9-13.】
兒福聯盟(2020)。臺灣民眾被家長體罰經驗與認知調查報告。https://www.children.org.tw/ publication_research/research_report/446
【Child Welfare League Foundation, R.O.C. (2020). A survey report on Taiwanese people’s experience and perception of corporal punishment by parents. https://www.children.org.tw/publication_research/ research_report/446】
兒福聯盟(2021)。2021疫情時代下臺灣學童幸福感調查。https://www.children.org.tw/ publication_research/research_report/444
【Child Welfare League Foundation, R.O.C. (2021). 2021 Taiwanese children’s well-being survey in the COVID 19 epidemic. https://www.children.org.tw/publication_research/research_report/444】
卓淑玲、洪儷瑜、蘇嘉鈴、陳學志(2009)。「貝克學童及青少年量表」之中文化研究。測驗學刊,56,639-669。https://doi.org/10.7108/PT.200912.0639
【Cho, S.-L., Hung, L.-Y., Su, C.-L., & Chen, H.-C. (2009). A research of the Chinese version Beck youth inventories. Psychological Testing, 56, 639-669. https://doi.org/10.7108/PT.200912.0639】
陳志明、李雅婷(2013)。正向情緒課程對國中生生活適應及情感狀態效果之研究。教育心理學報,44(2),215-240。
【Chen, Z.-M., & Li, Y.-T. (2013). The effects of positive emotion curriculum on junior high school students’ life adaptation and emotional state. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 44(2), 215-240.】
張雅文(2017)。正向情緒教學應用於國小學童之研究:以自信、知足、感恩課程實施為例。教育心理學報,45(4),321-342。
【Zhang, Y.-W. (2017). Application of positive emotion teaching to elementary school students: A case study of confidence, contentment, and gratitude courses. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 45(4), 321-342.】
張高賓、戴嘉南(2005)。國內「學童團體諮商與心理治療」整合分析研究。中華輔導學報,18,77-120。
【Chang, K.-P., & Tai, C.-N. (2005). A meta-analysis of children’s group counseling and psychotherapy in Taiwan. Chinese Annual Report of Guidance and Counseling, 18, 77-120.】
黃雅婷(2022)。正向行為介入與支持在小學班級經營的運用。教育研究與發展期刊,18(2),79-98。
【Huang, Y.-T. (2022). Application of positive behavior interventions and supports in elementary classroom management. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 18(2), 79-98.】
黃秋霞(2016)。情緒智力的正思與反思。臺灣教育評論月刊,5(7),101-110。
【Huang, C.-X. (2016). Positive and reflective thinking on emotional intelligence. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 5(7), 101-110.】
曾幼涵、謝蕙春、鄭龍水、周才忠(2019)。偏鄉教育與發展希望工程:偏鄉和部落小學「夢想教室」之實施成效及未來願景。教育脈動,19,1-7。
【Zeng, Y.-H., Xie, H.-C., Zheng, L.-S., & Zhou, C.-Z. (2019). Hometown education and development hope project: The implementation effect and future vision of “dream classroom” in primary schools in remote areas. Pulse of Education, 19, 1-7.】
新北市教育局(2022)。118課綱「心」趨勢:社會情緒教育啟動。
【Social Emotional Learning in New Taipei City. (2022). 118 Curriculum “Heart” Trend: Social Emotional Education kicks off “literacy” education in elementary schools in New Taipei City. https://www.cna.com.tw/ postwrite/chi/331727.】
親子天下(2022)。SEL社會情緒學習。https://site.parenting.com.tw/topic/media_SEL-927
【Parenting Magazine. (2022). Social and emotional learning (SEL). https://site.parenting.com.tw/topic/ media_SEL-927】
誠致教育基金會(2025)。以學校出發,透過SEL建構溫暖正向的同心圓。
【Chengzhi Education Foundation. (2025). Starting from schools: Building a warm and positive community circle through SEL.】
蔡居澤(2023)。融合體驗學習與社會情緒學習之攀樹課程發展。臺灣教育評論月刊,12(3),148-154。
【Tsai, J.-Z. (2023). Development of Tree climbing courses integrating experiential learning and social emotional Learning. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 12(3), 148-154.】
臺北市教育局(2018)。臺北市性別平等教育網課程與教學之社會情緒學習專區。
【Social Emotional Learning in Taipei City. (2018). Social emotional learning zone for curriculum and teaching under the Taipei City Gender Equality Education Network.】
教育部(2025)。社會情緒學習中長程計畫第一期五年計畫。
【Ministry of Education, Taiwan. (2025). First five-year phase of the mid-to-long-term social and emotional learning (SEL).】
熊師瑤、余民寧、程淑華(2024)。沉浸式虛擬實境應用:軍校生敬畏情緒對利社會行為之影響。教育科學研究期刊,69(2),69-100。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202406_69(2).0003
【Hsiung, S.-Y., Yu, M.-N., & Cheng, S.-H. (2024). Metaverse in the military: Using virtual reality to enhance awe emotions and prosocial behaviors among cadets. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 69(2), 69-100. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202406_69(2).0003】
劉玉山、李文慧(2009)。正向情緒輔導介入方案對國小學童情緒智力、生活適應與幸福感之研究。教育心理學報,40(2),27-48。
【Liu, Y.-S., & Li, W.-H. (2009). The effects of positive emotion counseling intervention on emotional intelligence, life adaptation, and well-being of elementary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 40(2), 27-48.】
劉政宏、黃博聖、蘇嘉鈴、陳學志、吳有城(2010)。國中小學習動機量表」之編製及其信、效度研究。測驗學刊,57,371-402。https://doi.org/10.7108/PT.201009.0371
【Liu, C.-H., Huang, P.-S., Su, C.-L., Chen, H.-C., & Wu, Y.-C. (2010). The development of learning motivation scale for primary and junior high school students. Psychological Testing, 57, 371-402. https://doi.org/ 10.7108/PT.201009.0371】
劉宗幸(2021)。實施社會情緒學習課程提升青少年自我調節能力。台灣教育,731,84-86。
【Liu, Z.-X. (2021). Implementing social emotional learning curriculum to enhance adolescents’ self-regulation. Taiwan Education, 731, 84-86.】
蕭佳純(2017)。國小學生正向情緒與創造力關聯之研究:以創造力傾向及創意自我效能為中介變項。教育研究與發展期刊,13(4),57-84。
【Hsiao, C.-C. (2017). The correlation between elementary pupils’ positive emotion and creativity with creativity tendency and creative self-efficacy as the mediators. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 13(4), 57-84.】
謝曜任(2005)。國小學童偏差行為與其學校經驗相關之初探研究。高應科大人文社會科學學報,2,249-271。
【Hsieh, I.-Z. (2005). A study of the correlation between deviant behaviors and the school experience of students in the elementary school. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2, 249-271.】
謝傳中、李慧婕、張伊涵、陳昱然(2024)。線上教學情境下教師情緒勞務對自我效能之影響:正念的調節效果。教育科學研究期刊,69(2),43-67。https://doi.org/10.6209/ JORIES.202406_69(2).0002
【Hsieh, C.-C., Li, H.-C., Chang, Y.-H., & Chen, Y.-J. (2024). The influence of online teaching emotional labor on teacher self-efficacy during COVID-19: The moderator of mindfulness. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 69(2), 43-67. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202406_69(2).0002】
羅玉霞、王麗斐(2000)。國小高年級教師面對學童外向性行為問題的知覺與因應策略之研究。中華輔導學報,8,141-176。
【Lo, Y.-S., & Wang, L.-F. (2000). A study on upper elementary school homeroom teachers’ perception of and strategies for handling students’ external behavioral problems. Chinese Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 8, 141-176.】
二、外文文獻
Ashdown, D. M., & Bernard, M. E. (2012). Can explicit instruction in social and emotional learning skillsbenefit the social-emotional development, well-being, and academic achievement of youngchildren? Early Childhood Education Journal, 39, 397-405.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514. 51.6.1173
Bai, B., Shen, B., Wang, J., & Song, H. (2024). Relations between motivation, social and emotional learning (SEL), and English learning achievements in Hong Kong primary schools. Cambridge Journal of Education, 54, 417-436. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2024.2367484
Basheer, A., Asadi, I. A., & Asli, D. (2025). The impact of combining laboratory experiments on scientific text reading comprehension and motivation in Arabic. Journal of Learning Sciences, 30, 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2025.2463111
Bear, G. G., Whitcomb, S. A., Elias, M. J., & Blank, J. C. (2015). SEL and schoolwide positive behavioral interventions and supports. In J. A. Durlak, C. E. Domitrovich, R. P. Weissberg, & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.), Handbook of social and emotional learning: Research and practice (pp. 453-467). The Guilford Press.
Boustani, M. M., Frazier, S. L., Becker, K. D., Bechor, M., Dinizulu, S. M., Hedemann, E. R., Ogle, R. R., & Pasalich, D. S. (2015). Common elements of adolescent prevention programs: Minimizing burden while maximizing reach. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 42, 209-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-014-0541-9
Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., Reyes, M. R., & Salovey, P. (2012). Enhancing academic performance and social and emotional competence with the RULER feeling words curriculum. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(2), 218-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.10.002
Brackett, M. A., Reyes, M. R., Rivers, S. E., Elbertson, N. A., & Salovey, P. (2012). Assessing teachers’ beliefs about social and emotional learning. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30, 219-236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911424879
Brackett, M. A., & Rivers, S. E. (2014). Transforming students’ lives with social and emotional learning. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 368-388). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Burnette, J. L., O’Boyle, E. H., VanEpps, E. M., Pollack, J. M., & Finkel, E. J. (2013). Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 139(3), 655-701. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029531
Cameron, T., Brown, V. A., Katz-Buonincontro, J., Anderson, B., Edmunds, A., Land, J., & Livie, M. (2024). “Mirrors and windows:” A case study of educators’ culturally responsive teaching aspirations and syllabi transformation in the arts. Teaching and Teacher Education, 48, 104714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104714
Cejudo, J., Losada, L., & Feltrero, R. (2020). Promoting social and emotional learning and subjective well-being: Impact of the “aislados” intervention program in adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(2), 609. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/ijerph17020609
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. (2017). Core SEL competencies.
Committee for Children. (2011). Second step: Skills for social and academic success.
Cook, E. T., Greenberg, M. T., & Kusche, C. A. (1994). The relations between emotional understanding, intellectual functioning, and disruptive behavior problems in elementary- school-aged children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 22, 205-219. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/BF02167900
Cook, D., & Artino, A. (2016). Motivation to learn: An overview of contemporary theories. Medical Education, 50(10), 997-1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13074
Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124-130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
Denham, S. A., & Brown, C. (2010). “Plays nice with others”: Social-emotional learning and academic success. Early Education and Development, 21(5), 652-680. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10409289.2010.497450
Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 403-425. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056
Domitrovich, C. E., Harris, A. R., & Syvertsen, A. K. (2022). Promoting social and emotional learning in middle school: Intervention effects of facing history and ourselves. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 51, 1921-1934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-022-01596-3
Dowling, K., & Barry, M. M. (2020). The effects of implementation quality of a school-based social and emotional well-being program on students’ outcomes. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 10(2), 518-530. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe10020044
Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16(12), 939-944. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social-cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859
Edgar, S. N., & Elias, M. J. (2020). Setting the stage for social emotional learning (SEL) policy and the arts. Arts Education Policy Review, 122(3), 127-131. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913. 2020.1777494
Elmi, C. (2020). Integrating social emotional learning strategies in higher education. International Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 10(3), 848-858. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/ejihpe10030061
Franzmann, T. K., Renshaw, T. L., & Bundock, K. (2024). Integrated behavioral supports: Combining PBIS and SEL at Tier 2. School Mental Health: A Multidisciplinary Research and Practice Journal, 17, 173-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-024-09716-z
Garcia, E. B., Woodbridge, M. W., & Sumi, W. C. (2024). The impact of the tools for getting along curriculum on teachers’ reports of elementary students’ executive functions, social-emotional skills, and behavior problems. Elsevier Social-Emotional Learning Research.
Gehlbach, H., & Chuter, C. (2020). Conceptualizing the core of “social emotional learning”. ACCESS: Contemporary Issues in Education, 40(1), 24-33. https://doi.org/10.46786/ac20.8910
Greenberg, M. T., Kusché, C. A., Cook, E. T., & Quamma, J. P. (1995). Promoting emotional competence in school-aged children: The effects of the PATHS curriculum. Development and Psychopathology, 7(1), 117-136. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400006374
Greenberg, M. T., & Abenavoli, R. (2017). Universal interventions: Fully exploring their impacts and potential to produce population-level impacts. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1, 40-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2016.1246632
Hawkins, J. D., Smith, B. H., & Catalano, R. F. (2004). Social development and social and emotional learning. In J. E. Zins, R. P. Weissberg, M. C. Wang, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does the research say? (pp. 135-150). Teachers College Press.
Healey, L. S. (2023). The role of social-emotional learning programs on intrinsic motivation and academic achievement in high school students: A self-determination approach [Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
Hunter, L. J., DiPerna, J. C., Cheng, W., Lei, P., & Hart, S. C. (2021). Twice as nice? Sustained exposure to a universal social-emotional learning program across multiple grades. School Mental Health, 13(3), 84-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-020-09392-9
Jones, S. M., & Bouffard, S. M. (2012). Social and emotional learning in schools: From programs to strategies: Social policy report. Society for Research in Child Development, 26(4), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2379-3988.2012.tb00073.x
Knier, K., Harrison, T., Grady, M., Brock, A., Sood, G., Fuehrer, D., Sood, A., & Pierret, C. (2024). Social-emotional learning program: A community-based case-controlled study. Academia Mental Health and Well-Being, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.20935/ MHealthWellB7308
Lopes, P. N., Salovey, P., Cote, S., Beers, M., & Petty, R. E. (Eds.). (2005). Emotion regulation abilitiesand the quality of social interaction. Emotion, 5, 113-118. https://doi.org/10.1037/ 1528-3542.5.1.113
Mahoney, J. L., Weissberg, R. P., & Greenberg, M. T. (2021). Systemic social and emotional learning: Promoting educational success for all preschool to high school students. American Psychologist, 76(7), 1128-1142. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000701
McCormick, M. P., Neuhaus, R., O’Connor, E. E., White, H. I., Horn, E. P., Hayding, S., Cappella, E., & McClowry, S. (2020). Long-term effects of social-emotional learning on academic skills: Evidence from a randomized trial of INSIGHTS. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 14(2), 198-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2020.1831117
Merrell, K. W., Juskelis, M. P., Tran, O. K., & Buchanan, R. (2008). Strong kids: A social and emotional learning curriculum for elementary-aged children. The Journal of Applied School Psychology, 24(2), 209-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377900802089981
Ministry of Education, Singapore. (n.d.). 21st century competencies. Retrieved August 8, 2025, from https://www. moe.gov.sg/education-in-sg/21st-century-competencies
Mira-Galvañ, M. J., & Gilar-Corbi, R. (2020). Design, implementation and evaluation of an emotional education program: Effects on academic performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01100
Morgan, T. L., Cieminski, A. B., Marmo, S., & Morgan, K. K. (2024). The effect of the advocacy social-emotional learning program on emotional competence. International Journal of Child and Education, 4(2), 2852. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE42022852
Oberle, E., & Schonert-Reichl, K. A. (2017). Social and emotional learning: Recent research and practical strategies for promoting children’s social and emotional competence in schools. In J. L. Matson (Ed.), Handbook of social behavior and skills in children (pp. 175-197). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64592-6_11
Oliveira, S., Roberto, M. S., Pereira, N. S., & Antunes, H. (2021). Impacts of social and emotional learning interventions for teachers on teachers’ outcomes: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 677217. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.677217
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). OECD framework for social and emotional skills: Well-being, connectedness and success. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd. org/education/ceri/OECD-Framework-for-SEL.pdf
Osher, D., Kidron, Y., Brackett, M., Dymnicki, A., Jones, S., & Weissberg, R. P. (2016). Advancing the science and practice of social and emotional learning: Looking back and moving forward. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 644-681. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16673595
Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage.
Pham, S. V. (2024). The influence of social and emotional learning on academic performance, emotional well-being, and implementation strategies: A literature review. Saudi Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 9(12), 381-391.
Reback, R. (2010). Schools’ mental health services and young children’s emotions, behavior, and learning. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 29(4), 698-725. https://doi.org/10.1002/ pam.20528
Richardson, J. T. E. (2011). Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 135-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.edurev.2010.12.001
Rudolph, C. W., Allan, B., Clark, M. A., Hertel, G., Kunze, F., Shockley, K., Shoss, M., Sonnentag, S., & Zacher, H. (2021). Pandemics: Implications for research and practice in industrial and organizational psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 14(1-2), 1-35. https:// doi.org/10.1017/iop.2020.48
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78. https:// doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Sandilos, L. E., Neugebauer, S. R., DiPerna, J. C., & Hart, S. C. (2023). Social-emotional learning for whom? Implications of a universal SEL program and teacher well-being for teachers’ interactions with students. School Mental Health, 15(1), 157-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12310-022-09543-0
Social and Emotional Aspects of Learning. (2005). The Social and Emotional Aspects of Learning (SEAL) by the English government. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7b0ce6ed915d429748c77a/DFE-RR049.pdf
Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. Free Press.
Setia, S., Tichy, M., & Gilbert, F. (2024). Innovating social-emotional learning to enhance positive engagement of youth with social media: A comprehensive review of why and how. Cureus, 16(9), e70130. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.70130
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychological methods, 7(4), 422-445. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422
Sun, R. C. F., & Shek, D. T. L. (2010). Life satisfaction, positive youth development, and problem behaviour among Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong. Social Indicators Research, 95(3), 455-474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9531-9
Tan, M. C. C., Chye, S. Y. L., & Teng, S. M. (2023). Teaching social-emotional learning with immersive virtual technology: Exploratory considerations. In S. Y. L. Chye & B. L. Chua (Eds.), Cognition and psychology in digital education (pp. 169-188). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-981-99-2107-2_10
Tan, O. S., & Chua, J. J. E. (2024). Social-emotional learning (SEL) and well-being in child development. In O. S. Tan, E. L. Low, I. S. Caleon, & E. L. Ng (Eds.), Enhancing holistic well-being of children and youth (pp. 201-225). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-981-97-3515-0_14
Taylor, R. D., Oberle, E., Durlak, J. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2017). Promoting positive youth development through school-based social and emotional learning interventions: A meta-analysis of follow-up effects. Child Development, 88(4), 1156-1171. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12864
Thierry, K. L., Vincent, R. L., & Norris, K. S. (2022). A mindfulness-based curriculum improves young children’s relationship skills and social awareness. Mindfulness, 13(3), 730-741. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s12671-022-01830-w
United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organizatoin. (2002). SEL for everyone.
Veenhoven, R. (2016). Quality of life and happiness: Concepts and measures. In F. Maggino (Ed.), Handbook of research methods and applications in happiness and quality of life (pp. 207-237). Edward Elgar.
Weiner, B. (2010). The development of an attribution-based theory of motivation: A history of ideas. Educational Psychologist, 45(1), 28-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903433596
Weissberg, R. P., Dusenbury, L., Calin, S., & Domitrovich, C. (2015). What does evidence-based instruction in social and emotional learning actually look like in practice? CASEL.
Wu, M. S., Ma-Kellams, C., Xie, T., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Culture and morality: Things we value. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1528375. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1528375
Xiong, Y. (2025). The influence of classroom environment and socio-emotional learning on EFL writing engagement: The mediating role of motivation regulation strategy. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-025-00989-9
Zenner, C., Herrnleben-Kurz, S., & Walach, H. (2014). Mindfulness-based interventions in schools-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 603. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2014.00603
Zins, J. E., Weissberg, R. P., Wang, M. C., & Walberg, H. J. (2004). Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does the research say? Teachers College Press.
| APA Format | Lin, H.-L., & Chen, H.-C., & Tsai, M.-H. (2025). The Impact of Social and Emotional Learning Interventions on Learning Motivation, Academic Achievement, Anxiety, Misbehavior, and Well-being. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 70(3), 167-214.
|
|---|